This is accomplished by the general encompassing policies of a universal abundant dividend and an abundant discount percentage to prices at retail sale. It is further able to saturate the economy with monetary gifting if every business model’s retail product is included in the discount policy.
Wisdomics/Gracenomics: The Ultimate Integration of Economic Theory and Ethics, DSGE, Disequilibrium and Complexity Theories and So Economic Science and Spirituality/Consciousness. Also, Relationship To The Cosmic Code
The ethical primacy of the individual is the essential consideration for any human system. Economic theory has become so obsessed with the application of science and mathematics ONLY that such theories become unable to focus on the true and deepest problem (the monopolistic paradigm of debt ONLY) and so they become ethically challenged.
Wisdomics/Gracenomics being the application of Wisdom/Integration and its pinnacle concept Grace applied to economic theory, i.e. Individual Freedom/Systemic Free Flowingness/Unity Within Diversity/Oneness-Wholeness/Process, is the answer to all of the neglect of the individual, the systemic instability, the contentiousness, egotism, intellectual fragmentation and reactionary lurching back and forth between opposing theories that has characterized economic theories for the last two and a half centuries.
As Wisdom is also the best integration of the truths, workabilities, applicabilities and highest ethical considerations of apparently opposing ideas/theories, and the deletion of their mutual untruths etc., and the concept/experience of Grace is the pinnacle of Wisdom, so Wisdomics/Gracenomics is the best/pinnacle integration of General Equilibrium, Disequilibrium and Complexity Theories.
- integration of apparent opposites is the signature of Wisdom
- the answer to ambiguity/complexity has always been Wisdom, and
- the ultimate Wisdom, Grace, which is synonymous with an intensely focused experience of the flow of present moments, is the full and integrative inclusion of Science, Ethics and Spirituality/Consciousness.
One can better understand this if they envision three concentric circles the inner being Science, the second Ethics and the third Spirituality/Consciousness and understand that the outer circles include all of the valid/integrated considerations of the circle(s) below/within it and all of the concepts below/within the outer circles have aligned reflectivities in those above it. In other words everything is mutually integrated and integrative. All of the opposite and unintegrated factors involved can fit within the formula of The Cosmic Code for a full reductionistic analysis and further integrated philosophically/ethically and spiritually with the ultimate integrative concept of Grace which is the thirdness aspect of The Cosmic Code.
Wisdomics/Gracenomics is the monetary and economic subset and application of the theory of everything known as The Cosmic Code which is described by the words:
An integrated Duality within an integrative Trinity-Unity-Oneness-Process
and is formulated thusly:
[ ( A x B) G/C ] or its inverse [ G/C (A x B) ]
The Cosmic Code: Debt and Gifting, Private and Public Monetary Monopoly
[ (Debt/Legalism x Monetary Gifting/Spirit) <–> Economic Free Flowingness/Grace Consciousness ]
[ (Private Monetary Monopoly x Public Monetary Monopoly) <–> National Credit Office, a govern-mentally sanctioned monetary body with specifically mandated direct and reciprocally gifting policies to individuals and enterprise and with ultimate control of the issuance of all new monies ]
The Cosmic Code: Grace/Consciousness, The Most Operant and Dynamic Factor In Human History
The Cosmic Code: Quantum Scientific Animism
Pre-historic Man lived in a magical and enchanted world where everything seemed alive and there were far fewer abstractions, systems and time consuming inanities. This is not to say that life was some kind of Arcadian utopia, simply that the obstacles to a more direct experience and enjoyment of one’s self and the present time environment were far fewer. The development of civilization, industrialization and science have increasingly preoccupied us, and now with all of the modern technological distractions we see increasingly dispersing our attention we have further eroded our ability to mentally focus on the moment thereby weakening our ability to deeply perceive ourselves and detail in the environment as well.
We require a mental integration of scientific thinking and psychology/spirituality, and the implementation of daily practices that promote, encourage and acculturate both modes of thought. A Quantum Scientific Animism or Quantum Scientific Pan-entheistism with daily contemplation of the many aspects and experiences of the concept of Grace as well as daily contemplation of one’s immediate surroundings would reap many personal and cultural benefits and repair and replace the atomism, anomie and increasingly obsessive egotism and contentiousness we seem to be unconsciously drifting toward.
The Cosmic Code Trinity: Integrate and Then Expand and Ascend The Mindset
Posted To a YouTube Video
Oddly the resolution of the problem is relatively easy. The philosophical (not religious) idea of grace needs to be implemented via reflective economic and monetary policies for both the individual and enterprise, and then the helping professions, the clergy and the world’s governments need to make an integrated effort to raise the individual’s consciousness of that concept and of the many positive and constructive purposes in addition to employment that one can pursue and enjoy. Grace as in monetary gifting and graciousness as in love in action have always been the secrets to a happy and productive life. All we really need to do is build institutions to support them so that they become more temporally apparent and more self actualized.
SOG: socialism
Me: The best and correct intention of socialism, that is monetary sharing for all…integrated with the best aspect of capitalism, abundance. And the understandings that there is nothing inherently wrong with profit, gain and that modern technologically advanced capital intensive economic systems are inherently cost inflationary and hence unstable without direct monetary gifting to the individual and reciprocal gifting of price and money at retail sale where costs are terminally summed and the economic process also ends.
The Cosmic Code: Light
[ (Wave x Particle) <–> Conscious Perception ]
Posted To The Social Credit Group Regarding Understanding Grace and Its Aplications 02/13/2017
GM: Ivan illich made a similar point in Rivers North of the Future, noting that St. John Chrysostom had preached against the establishment of institutions of charity by bishops. Prior to the institutionalization of charity, every Christian family put some bread aside in case the Lord should come to the door hungry when people came in need of food or shelter, the Christian Fed and sheltered them, did not simply refer them to a soup kitchen or a homeless shelter supported by taxes or contributions. Nor did they say, “we should change the social order to give these people a dividend!”
This is not to argue that Social Credit would not be an improvement on the current situation; only to point out that Grace must be personal, not institutional. Ivan illich was most eloquent on this in the above referenced book of conversations with Canada’sDavid Cayley, Rivers North in the Future.
There seems to be some diversity of opinion on that point within this group, and I recall numerous postings equating Social Credit with “Grace”. As far as Justice is concerned, perhaps a more nuanced and therefore more plausible assertion, do you accept the old definition of justice as “giving each one what is due?” Your assertion that this must mean a dividend seems to have no historical precedent, alleging that such a dividend is “just” comes out of nowhere. At best, Social Credit may be one way to attempt to make a more just socio-economic order. But to declare it the way, exclusively, is too much.
Furthermore, how can Social Credit ensure “justice” if it is National? Suppose that every Canadian and every US American gets an extra $10,000-$15,000 a year in a dividend to spend on more consumer goods. These are, for the most part, people comfortably well off and, on a global scale, extremely rich merely in so far as they have food, clothing, shelter, and access to education free of charge (at least k-12). How is it “just” to give these people a dividend to amplify their plenty, while many Mexicans and Indians and Filipinos live on vast garbage dumps trying to survive by what they can scrounge there? To be “just”, Social Credit would have to be global, it seems. No one seems to propose that. From what I have read of Major Douglas, even he seemed to think in terms of the nation state. So, the rich get richer. Three cheers for that?
Me: “This is not to argue that Social Credit would not be an improvement on the current situation; only to point out that Grace must be personal, not institutional.”
That would express the MERELY transcendental aspect of Grace as opposed to a more integrated understanding of it as both God’s Grace and grace as in love in action.
“Ivan illich was most eloquent on this in the above referenced book…”
I think that Illich’s critique was probably of the MERE institutionalization of charity/grace and not advocating either the non-cultivation of it as a personal experience or its reflective application in man’s temporal systems….because to do so would not be mentally consistent.
“There seems to be some diversity of opinion on that point within this group, and I recall numerous postings equating Social Credit with “Grace”.
I think there is unity within diversity regarding Grace here, and I think all of us would agree that the temporal expression of Grace as in love in action is what Social Credit is all about and is logically and spiritually consistent.
“As far as Justice is concerned, perhaps a more nuanced and therefore more plausible assertion, do you accept the old definition of justice as “giving each one what is due?”
That would be the MERE legalistic, i.e. pharisaic interpretation of economic and monetary justice, yes. One of the definitions of pharisaic according to Dictionary.com being: (lower case) practicing or advocating strict observance of external forms and ceremonies of religion OR conduct without regard to the spirit;
“At best, Social Credit may be one way to attempt to make a more just socio-economic order. But to declare it the way, exclusively, is too much.”
I, and I don’t think anyone else here has said it is the only way. I would say it is the best way and probably the only way that monetary and economic justice for both the individual and for enterprise, i.e. for the entirety of the economic system, can actually be accomplished…as opposed to being palliated out of ignorance, non-confront or perhaps out of alloyed integrity/other intention. Also, as it goes to the heart of the ideas/paradigms that the business model of finance currently uses to enforce its economic dominance, it is the terminal solution to that problem as well.
“Furthermore, how can Social Credit ensure “justice” if it is National?”
Because it is consistent with the Catholic concept of subsidiarity which would oppose an internationalization of monopolistic finance, and institutionalizing a national economic philosophy of grace and its BEST PROBLEM SOLVING reflective policies, is the correct process and an exact expression of that concept.
GM: I am not going to argue this. Maurin and Illich have done so eloquently. Consult them .
Me: Fine. What about the rest of what I posted? Or have you conveniently gone into intellectual apathy and so avoided looking at such?
GM: I will not respond to your offensive ad hominems. You can keep that for yourself
Me: Please address the content.
GM: no time for more.
Me: Fine. It’s all in the record.
Posted To Ellen Brown’s Blog 02/13/2017
SD: I don’t take anything Trump says at face value, Emily, anymore than I did with Obama. There is no way in hell we are going to see Glass-Steagall resurrected, nor do I expect we will see NAFTA renegotiated in any meaningful way. Trump promised to reform medicare prescription rates by renegotiating prescription rates with Big Pharma, and has already backed away on that and agreed with his corporate handlers that there will be no changes to their rip off scams in that arena. Same thing has been happening with his promises to work towards cooperation with Russia, in fact as I predicted his neocon appointees have instead immediately moved to further inflame tensions with Russia, China, and Iran.
Me: Exactly Stuart. And that is why maintaining the focus on and integrating any efforts to raise consciousness about the lack of structural financial competition and the monopolistic paradigms of finance is so important…because these two problems are the glue that keeps all of the systemic socio-economic, political and trans-national stupidities, including corporate dominance, in effect.
If there’s any strategy by Russia in this it is perhaps the sowing and fomenting of obsessive contentiousness in the US, the better to cripple the home and still military leader of Finance Capitalism which Putin as a Russian and former KGB operative undoubtedly has a wary historical, economic and geo-strategic regard for. Of course I don’t see Putin or any other national leader having much awareness of the solution to Finance either. They’re all caught up in international corporatist power plays and nationalist politics. Obsession with power and conflict is the modus operandi and apotheosis of Finance. The only place it can go is to the dust bin of history via monetary grace or drag us all into perdition. Despite being a panentheist and Quantum Scientific Animist I find the spiritual reflectivities ironic.
Never let our vision fall to a lesser target than Finance. It is the glue holding all other temporal idiocies in suspension.
***************************************************
I think the best stance on Trump is agnosticism. Unless or until he clearly breaks right and or corporatist, or indicates he’s aware of monetary movements like Public Banking/Social Credit and espouses policies reflecting that….how can anyone be sure where “his head is at”?
However, as I posted before with a guy like Steve Bannon as his chief strategist flux/confusion/change is his MO. I worry that Bannon who apparently is an advocate of “The Fourth Turning” which is a sketchy “pop” and amateurish view of Man and history authored by William Strauss and Neil Howe, has his ear. Strauss and Howe’s intellectual allegiances are linked to persons and corporations who believed in invalidated neo-liberal DSGE economic theory and the consequent moves toward mergers and acquisitions/hedge fund/derivatives nonsense that resulted in the “great financial crisis” in 2008, so I’m skeptical of the advice he’s getting.
If he was getting counsel aligned with the world’s major Wisdom traditions which is the best integration of the ideal and the practical and has a 10,000 year evolving history of observing Man and his interactions with the world…I’d be a lot more confident.
Social Credit/Wisdomics/Gracenomics/ Gracientialism 