Falsehoods, Distinctions Without a Difference and Unconsciousness/Hypnotism

These are the three levels of deceptiveness and delusion associated with paradigms and monitor how much of the theorist’s mind is still captured by an old paradigm.

Falsehoods aren’t that difficult to discover if one is a good observer of facts and can intelligently compare them to what has or is occurring.

Deciphering and refuting distinctions without a difference is a little more tricky because its an apparent answer that either contains particles of truth and/or is stated in a way that appears to answer a critque but actually doesn’t. This is a favorite of people whose minds are thoroughly captured by a current paradigm and are either trying to spin that paradigm or worse yet actually believe what they are saying. This is rampant in all politics, but most especially with the Trumpists at this time as their cry of “fake news” has almost completely muddied the distinction between truth and falsehood….and worse….their minds are so opague (letting neither light in nor out) that they have a sincerely passionate attachment to that delusion.  Certain schools of economics have this same problem.

Unconsciousness/Hypnotism is the normal state of almost everyone regarding paradigms of all sorts and varieties because almost no one even has a scrap of knowledge about the word and concept let alone some actually useful data and understanding of them. This level of delusion is the most difficult to overcome/see through because one must attain an entirely new level of consciousness to see that one is afflicted with it regarding the new paradigm. You see this alot in economics of course especially surrounding various orthodoxies on both the left and right perspectives regarding money, inflation, banking-finance, debt and money creation. Only when one steps entirely outside of the current paradigm are they able to truly defeat paradigmatic Unconsciousness/Hypnotism, and even then seeing the new paradigm entails a lucky set of circumstances like an outsider’s perspective, knowledge of a forgotten and/or falsely invalidated perspective that holds essential data for the recognition of the concept of the paradigm, discovery of a new tool that enlightens solutions to one or more of the problematic aspects of the current paradigm and finally having a set of ethics, intellectual curiosities and perseverance with them despite invalidation, ridicule, apathy and ignoring of them by pundits and “authorities”.


Wisdomics-Gracenomics and the Cosmic Reality of Grace

“This always begins with a specific interpretation of the world around us which, until shown differently is reality.”

Of course. And this is my interpretation:

1) Scarcity ratio and its resolution with the new paradigm of grace as in gifting

2) UBI reflective of grace, economists are just beginning to cognite on it

3) integrative tool of double entry bookkeeping, economists are ignorant of in general, its nature and the significances of the summing, ending, totaling and terminal expression points of costs/prices and all consumer inflation

4) Flawed static/full stop General equilibrium, grace as general interactive, integrative process and flow, higher abundant monetary disequilibrium is descriptive of temporal reality and accomplishes its nature of process and flow/free flowingness

5) Grace as highest concept of wisdom is every thing and the Other, and/or its opposite to the point of thirdness/greater oneness, (integrated duality within an integrative trinity-unity-oneness process) including the NATURAL EXISTENT REALITY NO MATTER TO WHOM OR WHAT IT IS ATTRIBUTED TO of grace as in consciousness itself

6) grace and scientific method are trinitarian processes, one of fragmented empirical/physical data only (true, untrue & hypothesis) the other of (empirical/physical data & wisdom) & grace as in consciousness itself

7) and science is in the process of awakening to this deeper, broader, epistemologicaly higher, more complete, more integrative and holistic reality for over a hundred years….all of which are adjectives describing/aspects of the natural philosophical concept of grace…..which indeed is the trulycutting edge scientific description of nature….that economics and every system including the totality of human reality….should emulate, mentally understand and self actualize.

So lets get on with it.


Posted To RWER Blog 07/20/2018

Again, for the 4th or 5th time, a paradigm is a new consciousness of a singular concept that also fits seamlessly within most of the objective structures of the body of knowledge it applies to and yet transforms and creates an entirely new pattern. Hence it is both a mental and an objective/temporal universe thing. Paradigms are the ultimate human historically integrative realizations AND events. They are supreme moments of wisdom both because integration is the very process of wisdom itself and because the result of such thorough integrations results in wisdom and wisdom’s highest natural philosophical systemic concept and/or personal experience…AKA grace/atonement/samadhi/ satori-kensho. Realizing a new paradigm is just such an ah ha experience and is what all scientists describe as such in the infrequent breakthroughs they all hope to have.

It is time for economists to awaken to the new monetary and economic paradigm of grace as in Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting and its aligned policies….and also for mankind to realize that an aspect or aspects of the natural philosophical concept of grace has always been the concept behind EVERY paradigm change.…..largely due to the fact that grace as in the continual dynamic interactive and integrative process and flow of everything, i.e. the cosmos is the truest and actual reality.

The Econometric Problem and Epistemology

Economic theories are nothing compared to economic policies and their actual effects. Desired economic effects depend upon their being implemented in the temporal universe at significant and relevant places and times within the economic process that also have direct, immediate and the desired effects.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with theorizing, but if you desire individual and systemic abundance instead of austerity, a definitive way of ending inflation instead of enduring it or claiming some conservative orthodoxy that it can’t be dealt with or liberal orthodoxy that it won’t occur…..then YOU’RE JUST NOT LOOKING at the integrative infrastructure of all commerce, i.e. double entry bookkeeping and the significant places and times where policies can be implemented that all heterodox economists here would agree….IS WHAT THEY’D LIKE TO SEE HAPPEN IN THE ECONOMY……ON A CONTINUING BASIS.

Is it okay here to have a discussion about the nature of accounting, economic policies that are possible from that nature and an economic analysis of the direct temporal universe effects of those policies implemented at specific points???


The main reason why ALL present econometric models are wrong is they’re not looking directly at the economy, economists are largely ignorant of the identical natures of double entry bookkeeping and the pricing and money systems and hence they do not realize that policies that will resolve the major problematic situations in modern economies are possible by coming out of their habitual and near abstract fugues and LOOKING at the above tools and their significances to the economy.

On an epistemological scale looking is right below the highest level of knowledge possible, that is, knowing.

Paradigms Are Both The Witchery of Humanity and Its Salvation

Like the biblical two edged sword they cut both ways. For the Good and its increase in a new paradigm, or the continuation of the disintegration of problematic conditions built up in an old one. For those aware of what paradigms are and who recognize the signs of a lingering old one there is no other path forward and no going back to the old ways once the new paradigm is finally recognized.

The Master Game/Paradigm Perception/Wisdomics-Gracenomics

It’s funny how ideas take root in one’s mind and just wait for us to re-discover and further integrate them. Re-reading from Part 1 about the various mental games De Ropp enumerates the higher games of art, science, religion and master games, if I may be so bold, I think what I refer to as paradigm perception is the integration of all four of the higher games and which would also be a parallel integrative temporal universe game to the personal master game.

If Wisdom is the process of integration of ideas, truths and apparent opposites and also the best integration of the practical, the ideal and the ethical call it the Wisdom/Paradigm Perception Game. Paradigms as I have previously posted by definition are integrative “things” in that they are simultaneously single unitary mental concepts that fit/apply seamlessly within the area of human endeavor/body of knowledge they take place in and yet create an entirely new qualitative pattern as well. It also fits the integrated duality within an integrative thirdness greater oneness formula I’ve floated here several times.

This is not to lay claim to some terrific genius on my part really, more a combination of flaw, desire for honesty, lucky grouping of intellectual interests, fate/coincidental timing and standing on the shoulders of giants which I would guess parallels the mindsets of most here.

Personal Quote

We need a Wisdomics, a Gracenomics. Wisdom is the best integration of the practical, the ideal and the ethical….and grace or whatever other wisdom word you want to hang on it is its pinnacle state or systemic condition.

The True Centrist

The true centrist is actually an indicator of someone who is willing and able to integrate the truths in apparently opposing perspectives while simultaneously deleting their separate or mutual untruths. This is actually the very process of Wisdom itself, and is far above what is often thought of as compromise which is merely aglomerating opposing agendas without the truthfulness purification process above.