Posted To RWER Blog 02/22/2018

Me:  If you don’t perceive at the level of paradigm you can theorize for ever and not see either the singular concept to base and align all policy and regulation on, or the new pattern that they all fit into. There’s nothing wrong with theorizing of course, but it’s such a much more simple rational process….after you perceive the paradigm.

Paradigm perception is the systemic equivalent of awareness….of awareness, i.e. consciousness itself. This is not new age BS it’s simply thorough going integrative thinking. Again, once you know the new paradigm you see its aligned policies, regulations and structural necessities so much more clearly and definitively, and then all you need to do is gen up the mass movement necessary to herd the entire political apparatus toward its sanity and beneficial effects.

I agree with theorists and reformers like Michael Hudson, Steve Keen and MMT. Now let’s recognize the paradigm that unifies their thinking and get it implemented….with post haste.

DT:  Well yes, Craig; so what do you make of what I keep trying to say? What I see deficient in your arguments is any mention of the form of payback for the giving. It certainly shouldn’t be tit for tat, as the monetarists now demand.

Me:  The pay back is the rebating of every cent of the retail merchant’s discount/gift to the consumer by a monetary authority specifically mandated to do so, and so that they are made whole on their overheads and margins of profit. The new paradigm is Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting. This is not the indirect, abstract, flawed and elitist financial nonsense of monetarism. It is the new paradigm of Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting. Any other questions? I’ll be happy to address them.

Steve Keen correctly identifies the fact that modern economies are demand constrained and in disequilibrium. But he didn’t see that we can create what I refer to as “the higher disequilibrium” by cogniting on the fact that retail sale is the terminal expression point for inflation and utilize the digital nature of the pricing and money systems and implement a discount/rebate policy that breaks up Finance’s virtual monopoly on credit creation and is of a high enough percentage that no enterprise can game it or resist opting into it.

Michael Hudson correctly rails against Finance as parasitical. The fact that one agrees to buy a home from a home building corporation for $200k…and then POST that retail sale you have to go to a bank and add on a note that increases your costs by a factor of 3 or 4….exposes finance as an exterior parasite that has been problematic for at least the last 5000 years as David Graeber has written about. It is the sheerest of folly that private finance with its monopoly paradigm of Debt ONLY can be stabilized. Public control of Finance of course has its own problems….unless its policies are directly and reciprocally beneficial to both the individual and enterprise….like the 50% retail discount/rebate which is the virtual expression of the new paradigm and a public monetary authority which does not allow libertine financialized speculation.

MMT has the system mechanics of money creation correctly defined. What they don’t see is the above discovery of the power of monetary policy linked directly to retail sale so that price deflation is painlessly and beneficially integrated into profit making systems. They also do not see the actual greatest insight of MMT which is that with the primacy of the new paradigm, i.e. DIRECT CREATION and distribution of credit/money….the government can fund itself without the need for income taxes. Instead they punt on politics and mistakenly advocate for a job guarantee only as the way to increase demand which is completely old paradigm while dismissing the aligned policy of a directly distributed universal dividend which paired with the discount/rebate policy immediately ends poverty. (Of course as an adjunct and aligned policy a job guarantee could be a part of new paradigm thinking for anyone who is having problems with finding purpose in addition to or without employment.)

The paradigm level of thinking. It clarifies, focuses and unites the best reforms.

DT:  So, Craig, you’ve not answered my question (“what do you make of what I keep trying to say?

Me:  “So, Craig, you’ve not answered my question (“what do you make of what I keep trying to say?”

With all due respect, and I DO respect your prodigious intellect, I think much of what you say is erudite irrelevance by comparison to the clarity and focus that is and that results from genuine paradigm CHANGE perception. I can identify with the problem. Trying to integrate thinking on temporal matters while carrying the burden of simultaneously needing to communicate the necessity of a new paradigm whose nomenclature is identical with traditionally religious thinking is very difficult and problematic especially when science ONLY is the current paradigm for intellectual inquiry.

Money, debt and banks are the essential economic factors that neo-classical economics confuses/ignores. The paradigm of monetary Gifting breaks up the monopolistically contradictory and dominating paradigm of Debt ONLY that private banking/finance currently and problematically enjoys, and if finance/banking as a public utility was thoroughly based upon and focusedly aligned with policy and regulations reflecting Gifting and the natural philosophical concept and ethic-zeitgeist of grace from which the concept of Gifting is derived….then the trinity of factors at the beginning of this paragraph could become part of a thirdness greater oneness that is the signature of Wisdom, grace and paradigm change.

The Cosmic Code: Relevant In Every Way

The Cosmic Code  [ (A  x  B)  <–>  G/C ]

is not only the formula of Wisdom and the experience of Grace. It is also the definition and formulation of logic, of process, of growth, of the natural/temporal universe and of consciousness itself. It is also the formula of human therapy as the duality is the definition of a conflict/personal problem (emotion x counter emotion) (thought x counter thought) (intention x  counter intention) and the thirdness greater flowing and integrated oneness is the result of consciousness resolving the conflict.

The Cosmic Code is reflected throughout nature, human logic and thought, the mental disciplines of both Science and Wisdom and again, of consciousness itself. It is a TOE, a theory of everything. It is the formula for conflict resolution…..whatever the conflict may be. It is the path toward rationality, fully ethical thinking. It is the formula for deciphering and integrating the entire existential truth of any matter.

Creating The US Department of Innovation, Competition and Most Importantly of Ecological Sanity

The key to ecological sanity is establishing  money creation as a non-profit public utility based on the new monetary paradigm of grace as in Gifting not just state public banks which still only create money as debt. Making finance an economically efficient and stable business model and costless and paradigmatic-ally  freeing public service will enable us to finance all of the best ecological innovations and retro-fitting of current infrastructure that will lead us to sustainability.

This does not mean there will no longer be loans/debt/borrowing, just that monetary Gifting will become the new primary financial and economic paradigm and that borrowing will not exact additional costs.

Let us end the hypnotism of private profit making finance.

Liberal and Conservative Reformers and Paradigm Perceivers

Almost everyone is well intentioned. Almost no one sees the third integrative alternative and so the paradigm change. Liberal reformers and conservative authoritarians are alike small minded and driven more by the psychology of domination and control associated with old/current paradigms than the self actualized emotions and freeing insights of new ones. This is not necessarily a put down, but it is an historically confirm-able fact.

Failure/refusal to actually look is the end of science and wisdom and the beginning of orthodoxy and all of the mental and emotional vices associated with it that humans are prone to. On a scale of epistemological understanding looking is right below knowing and knowing/knowingness is synonymous with self actualization/self knowledge.

Neither liberals nor conservatives have any substantial faith as in confidence, hope as in vision of the future, love as in passion for the Good and especially not grace as in love in action, for these most intimate reasons.

Paradigm perceivers are the loneliest people on the planet because they think and see in two directions at once, that is scientifically/reductionistic-ally and wisely/holistically/pattern-paradigmatic-ally and hence integratively  which mirrors and is the signature of  awareness of awareness i.e. self awareness. Being a perceiver of self awareness likewise mirrors the nature of the paradigm which is a single concept like Agriculture or Helio-centrism that simultaneously fits within, establishes and/or creates an entirely new pattern.

Let us look, let us see, let us know, let us love and then be gracious both individually and systemically which is love in action.

Grace: The Ultimate Integration and Universal Solvent

One cannot lose by contemplating both the concept and experience of grace.  Grace is the ultimate in integration of opposite truths and the universal solvent. Grace is taking the imminently corruptible experience and state of power and adding benevolence to it. It’s taking an often and ultimately tawdry goal like profit and adding self development and gifting to it. It’s every lowness and potential flaw intermixed with self edification and redemption, the philosopher’s stone and the statesman’s vision and bully pulpit.

Integrate and keep on integrating. Contemplate grace and move onward and upward.

Posted To RWER Blog 02/15/2018

Discussion is obviously a good thing, but is more productive AFTER one has recognized its relevant philosophical/psychological-experiential antecedent. Science is a trinity-fragmenting/fragmented-process of [ Hypothesis <–> (true?, false?) ] and so does not lead mentally in the necessary direction. Wisdom is a trinity-unity-oneness/wholeness-process…that also includes the scientific dualistic determination of truthfulness/falsity within it. This is why we need a Wisdomics instead of a mere economics. The more inclusive, more integrated the mindset the better. Consult the world’s major wisdom traditions for their mental/experiential/proverbial insights sans any of their surface dogmas and determine their pinnacle concepts/experiences….and then align and apply policy and regulation to the relevant situation or body of knowledge under discussion.

Grace: As In Consciousness Which Is of the Individual

As above so below, as the individual so the system. In other words straight line integrity of ethic, paradigm-purpose, philosophy, policy, sanctions and regulations.

A system based on the individual who is basically good but flawed and that is administered in a consciously wise, sovereign, dynamically aware way that responsibly works toward self improvement.

“Systems were made for man, and not man for systems, and the interest of man which is self-development, is above all systems, whether theological, political or economic.”

C. H. Douglas

Repeat Post

Questions and Answers About Wisdomics-Gracenomics-Giftonomics

My books have spoken about UBI or what I call a universal citizen’s dividend because part of its justification is that it is actually a payment based on every citizen’s inheritance from the nation’s cultural heritage of tremendous productive capacity built up over its history.  They also stress an even more important second and complementary policy I call the “universal retail product discount” which enables a thorough saturation of the entire economy with the new monetary paradigm of Gifting. It would also not only eliminate inflation, it would actually beneficially integrate price deflation into profit making systems….something that, up until I recognized this policy innovation, was considered impossible.
Here are some questions that would help better explain my theory of Wisdomics-Gracenomics:
What are the primary insights of each of the cutting edge theories of reform and how does Wisdomics-Gracenomics integrate, extend and improve upon them?

MMT  Main insight is that the monetary system can be distributive

Steve Keen’s Financial Instability Thesis  Main insight is that the problem lies with Finance whose product is money, also General Equilibrium Theory is fallacious and government austerity is completely ineffective and part of the problem not the solution

Public Banking  Main insight is that Private Banking is the primary structural problem

QE For The People/Positive Money/UBI/BIEN   Scarcity of individual income is major problem of modern economies/Private Finance’s virtual monopoly on credit creation is problematic

Social Credit   Actually preceded the insights of all of the above except it still had a remainder of orthodoxy regarding equilibrium and did not have a way to saturate the entire economy with the new paradigm they had discovered

Wisdomics-Gracenomics    Integrates all of the insights from above including Social Credit’s dual policies of a universal dividend and compensated retail discount and fully extends them so that their impact saturates the entirety of modern economies and actually reverses the problematic vector of same. It discovers the new paradigm and its full fleshing out of the philosophical concept behind the new paradigm brings full consciousness of it to economics and economists.

Finally it brings additional insights about the very process of Wisdom itself, (integration of the truths in opposites) and the trinity-unity-greater oneness nature of the scientific method, the logical and progressive process and of all new paradigms. It also brings new insights into the structural and mental manifestations and effects  that accompany all new paradigms (fully integrated duality, inversion of a problematic ratio, inversion of position-primacy of the old and new paradigms)

Can you explain and illustrate how the ‘universal retail product discount” policy works?
The point of sale is always a summing point and temporary stopping point of total costs and total price for any item or service. The pricing system and the money system are both digital, that is, if you discount $5 on a $10 price to your consumers and then a monetary authority reciprocally rebates you back your discount to your consumers, then the consumer gets a 50% decrease to his costs and so a 100% increase in his purchasing power….and the enterprise still gets their full price of $10.
If this discount policy is implemented at every point of sale throughout and within the entire economic process and every enterprise participating in the policy passes this 50% discount along to its consumers a 50% cost and price deflation is beneficially integrated into profit making systems.
Furthermore, because the policy is only implemented at the already summing and stopping point of a sale there is no heavy handed manipulative intrusion into the price discovery of the enterprise participating in the policy…only a gracious gifting to the consumer and a reciprocally gracious rebating back of the discount to the enterprise.
Why would it be readily accepted by virtually all business models?
Because it enables an enterprise to sell their product/service at 50% less, and combined with the Universal Dividend policy it creates the ideal business climate for any business of low prices and lots of purchasing power in the many hands of the consumer meaning there is a much greater likelihood of higher volume of sales which translates into greater profits. In essence it is an offer that a profit making enterprise cannot refuse because if you don’t participate….and participate honestly in the policy, then you don’t get any rebate and have to get all $10 from your consumers who can get a competitive product to yours for only $5.
Why are other theories/theorists only partially or even totally unconscious of the discount policy and its effectiveness?
Double entry bookkeeping is probably right up there with the computer as one of the greatest innovations of human history because it is the tool by which enterprise deciphers whether or not it is profitable. Its Debit-Credit digital format is also perfectly reflective of the format and actions of the discount policy.
As Steve Keen has said economists can get their PhD in economics and not have to take so much as a basic course in accounting. Hence they tend to be almost entirely unconscious of its actions and conventions. Hence they also miss the economic significance and policy potentials of the Debit-Credit  format as described in the discount policy.
And of course macro-economic and mathematical theorists are generally caught up in once, twice or thrice removed abstract considerations and so do not look directly at the moment to moment operations of commerce and so do not see the potential economic significance and benefits of policy implementation to be found there.
What are the current dominating monetary paradigms of Finance and what is the new paradigm necessary to be integrated into our economy and to become the new non-dominating primary one?
The current paradigms are Enforced Indirectness and Debt, Loan and For Production Only.  This enables the business model of Finance to dominate every other business model and probably 98-99% of the general populace.
The new primary paradigm is Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting. The new paradigm will not destroy Finance, only its dominance and its over weening power of credit creation.
Even more important than the new paradigm itself, what is the natural philosophical concept behind it…and why is full conscious awareness of this concept so important?
The concept behind the new paradigm is grace/graciousness. Grace is a traditionally religious concept in the west, but the truth is that grace has its counterparts in the experiences pointed at by all of the world’s major wisdom traditions like satori-kensho, the discipline of Bodhisattva, atonement and samadhi so the concept is actually a universal one.
The philosophical concept and psychological experience of Grace has many, many aspects virtually all of which address the resolution of dualistic conflicts and enable the full expression of grace whose signature is thirdness, unity-greater oneness-wholeness and process-continuousness.
Full awareness of the concept of grace/experience of graciousness is important not only as a resolution of our deepest economic and monetary problems, but because understanding and experiencing it is the universal solvent for any problem. Yes, that’s a big statement, but I stand by it.
The study of wisdom and grace is actually the ultimate scientific study. Science like grace is a trinity-unity-oneness process with its hypothesis and dualistic determination of truthfulness or falsity regarding only what science considers the physical universe. Wisdom is all of that plus the integration of consciousness-self awareness as well, or as I like to metaphorically state it:
Science, like food, is a wonderful, beautiful and necessary thing, and it resides entirely within the digestive tract of Wisdom and its pinnacle concept Grace.
Why do all of the cutting edge reforms/reformers above need to integrate their efforts with Wisdomics-Gracenomics, and why would the failure to do so be an unethical act of omission?
Basically because they all correctly deal with less penetrative aspects of the problem. In other words they are heading in the right direction we need to go, but they haven’t yet fully recognized the new paradigm and the resolving philosophical concept behind it….and that is what Wisdomics-Gracenomics has discovered along with the two basic policies and their aligned regulations that will best saturate the economy with the new paradigm.
What will occur if the reformers do not integrate with Wisdomics-Gracenomics is either only slight reform, no reform at all or even regression due to old wrong direction orthodoxies lingering. Even if slight reform occurs it will be a mere palliative of the deeper paradigmatic problem, and I would assert that settling for a palliative when an actual solution to the end of the domination of Finance’s monopolistic paradigms is available….is not an ethical action, but rather an unethical act of omission.
Why is a New Paradigm so powerful?
Paradigms are generally held ideas and/or patterns that people have awareness of to one degree or another. Hence one of the component parts of a paradigm is consciousness itself, and a paradigm change is an increase in conscious awareness of truth(s) and workabilities in whatever body of knowledge the new paradigm is applied to, in this instance economics, money and payment systems.
Historically everything adapts to a new paradigm…not the other way around. The reason for this is that a new paradigm is such an obvious advance because it resolves long time problems.  Also, in the instance of a new monetary and economic paradigm, the tremendous amount of time, effort, stress and human attention taken up by seeking economic and monetary security, especially as difficult economic times from the crisis in 2008 linger and disruptive economic forces like AI continue to increase….will be checked and an increase in the positive activities of leisure and positive and constructive personal purpose (leisure time is self chosen directed activity not idleness)  will be increased.
Finally, the broader the area of application of a new paradigm the more inclusive and powerful its effects are. In other words if a paradigm is in philosophy or even in spirituality its effects could actually be planetary or cosmic.
What other integrative political and economic benefits will occur with the implementation of the policies of Wisdomics-Gracenomics?
More of the agendas of both the republican and democratic parties would be accomplished with the policies of Wisdomics-Gracenomics. For instance:
Democratic Party:
much greater economic  democracy and the elimination of poverty with a relatively abundant universal dividend
increased competitiveness of small to medium sized businesses with the corporatocracy, and much greater likelihood of their profitability and longevity via both the dividend and discount policies
Republican Party:
much greater economic stability and an almost perpetually good investment climate via both the dividend and discount policies
with a sufficient dividend the ability to eliminate taxes paid by both individuals and businesses for welfare, unemployment insurance and quite quickly even for social security
As the new monetary and economic paradigm is directly distributive instead of re-distributive income taxes could also be mostly or completely eliminated, and with the discount policy integrating price deflation into the economy there would obviously not be any problem with inflation as a result
With such taxation becoming redundant and unnecessary not only would people’s paychecks be larger, but businesses would be able to save their contributions to such taxes
finally, the bureaucracies associated with these taxes (Social Security, Welfare, Unemployment Insurance and a drastic reduction in the size and scope of the IRS) could be virtually eliminated  Grover Norquist, are you listening?

Posted To RWER Blog 02/11/2018

Me:   It’s correct that perfectionism and absolutism is flawed. Even paradigm changes require regulation and lead on to further discoveries and eventually new changes. The trick is to see the paradigm as the singular concept that along with its logically aligned policies resolves, changes and advances everything in the current pattern beneficially. That is what clarifies, unifies and focuses such change as history testifies to.

Me:  @Rob Reno
“What kind of ethical moment does it take to put a human face in disruption?”

One that recognizes that money is the means of freedom in a monetary economy and that has discovered the singular time and place where the micro-economy integrates and aggregates with the macro-economy for any and all agents….and then initiating monetary policy at that point…and any necessary regulation that aligns with that freeing policy.

**********************************************

Regarding the Post

The Semantics of Mathematical Equilibrium Theory

Me:  With the new paradigm and policies of Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting the problem of the continual build up of both government and private debt is resolved by inverting the inherent scarcity ratio of total individual incomes to total costs and so prices. This ratio enforces the systemic necessity to continually borrow in order to prevent recession or worse. Inverting and transforming the ratio to an abundance of individual incomes to costs/prices with a lifelong universal dividend and preventing inflation with a 50% discount/rebate at the point of retail sale where price inflation is terminally expressed and a few aligned regulations to markets…..implements the new paradigm. It’s elegant, simple and insightful…just like every other paradigm change has been when people look at it and actually see it.

**********************************************

Me:  Here are two conceptual mathematical formulas based upon the Fibonacci sequence:

[ (monetary economy + private monopoly on credit creation) = enforced systemic monetary austerity, necessity to continually borrow and ever increasing power of the business model of Finance ]

[ (integration of policies of monetary gifting into digital money system + aligned regulations) = prosperous free flowingness of the new paradigm ]

Paradigms are single transformative concepts that fit seamlessly within a current framework and resolve the current paradigms most “intractable” problems. You can figure-figure-figure on data and theory and never perceive it, and, like now, all cutting edge reformers can suggest piecemeal but philosophically aligned policies to it and still not accomplish the holistic conceptual leap that consciously identifies it.