The Cosmic Code of Trinity-Unity-Oneness-Process is everywhere….if you simply look a little closer and deeper.

It’s in logic and thinking: [ (thesis x antithesis)  <–> synthesis ]

It’s in the very process of Wisdom-Integration:

[(truth of a perspective  x  truth of opposing perspective)  <–>  fuller/whole truth ]

It’s in the therapeutic/resolution process:

[ (personal postulate x opposing personal postulate)  <–>  resolution of personal problem

It’s all over nature:

a leaf   [ (the two symmetrical sides of a leaf)  <–>  and the stem in its middle from which both sides emerged ]

a tree   [ (trunk, branches)  <–>  roots from which they grew/emerged

a river  [ (source, course)  <–>  mouth ]

atomic structure  [ (proton x neutron)  <–>  electron ]

It’s in electro-magnetism:  [ (+ charge  x  – charge)  <–>  electricity/electric field ]

It’s in mathematics/Fibonacci sequence/cosmic structure:  [ (3, 5)  <–>  8 ] etc.

It’s in the cycle of action of the physical-temporal universe itself:

[ (Start, Change)  <–>  Stop ]

It’s in natural philosophy:  (Duality)  within Trinity-Unity-Oneness-Process [     ]   ….as in:

[ (A  x  B)  <–>  C ]

It’s in spirituality:

Christianity [ (Father  x  Son)  <–>  Holy Spirit ]

Hinduism/Buddhism  [ (Maya-Dualism)  <–>  Atman/Tao ]

Basically structural reforms are shallow and can be more easily gamed/overturned while philosophical -paradigmatic changes are much deeper. Keynesianism was a partial philosophical change and we see what happened to it. Wisdomics-Gracenomics is a philosophical, paradigmatic and spiritual (not parochially religious) change and so is a true “quantum leap” for economic theory and policy.

As Steve Keen has observed the economy is monetary not “a veil over barter” as neo-classical economic theory characterizes it. Money is actually one of the greatest and most useful inventions in history and for those reasons should not be abandoned. Money in fact is not the problem, but rather its virtual monopoly control by the business model of finance and its almost utter paradigmatic monopoly ideas of debt, loan and for production only by same.

The major problems with “the neo-classical synthesis” are its failure/refusal to confront these monopoly paradigms leaving the business model of finance curiously dominant in what is alleged to be a free and free flowing market, and its abstract and largely unconscious understanding of time as a mere flow of clock time instead of a flow of moments, each moment of which the vast majority of individuals and most enterprise, i.e the system, must endure a scarcity ratio of total individual income to total costs/prices enforced by the cost accounting convention that all costs must go into price, the continually rising depreciation costs of fixed capital, the continually rising costs of wasted energy enforced by the laws of thermo-dynamics and the inexorable wedding of profit making systems, obtainable (labor) cost efficiencies and now the coup de gras of AI which is posed to eliminate aggregate individual demand at a rate far exceeding the rate by which innovation has ever and always eliminated it since the industrial revolution.

And the way to eliminate these systemic problems including the dominance of the business model of finance is to wisely integrate a new paradigm/economic concept of monetary grace as in gifting into the debt based money system with strategically implemented policies specifically designed to rectify/invert the above scarcity ratio.

What is referred to as “the neo-classical synthesis” is actually just dominant financial ideology in disguise. A chronic scarcity of individual income in ratio to costs/prices cannot be resolved by any means of monetary injection that adds moment to moment net costs and thus results in the continuance of the dominance of finance. Hence the only monetary policies that make valid economic sense are those that are costless gifts. Ironically the solution is not mere attainment of statistical equilibrium which drops out the factor of time, hence  is static and will always remain “behind the curve” of actual dynamic economic free flowingness. The correct goal is reversing the dynamic scarcity ratio above so that a “higher dynamic disequilibrium” is attained and maintained through time thus freeing the individual and competitive enterprise from austerity with monetary abundance, enabling a systemic “orbital” free flowingness and correcting the monopoly state of finance all in one fell swoop.

Wisdomics-Gracenomics, the real and actual Neo-Classical Synthesis.

You’re wrong of course about deflation being sustainable and ethical without dividend and discount policies. You’re just an orthodox half assed and half brained Austrian pundit, and Keen and every other non-Austrian economist are just as half assed and half brained so far as conscious policy is concerned. I’m probably the only person, even amongst social crediters, who has the integrative understanding of what it is going to take policy wise to stabilize modern economies. Policies of abundant demand via a universal dividend and price deflation via a large discount at retail sale are the only policies that will de-throne and de-tooth finance and stabilize economies. Oh you’ll have a Trump “recovery” for a season….if he doesn’t shoot himself in the foot with other things, but it will never last for numerous reasons.

Integrate Austrian deflation and liberal recognition that the market is not god and requires policies to enable it to become and remain stable and you have Wisdomics-Gracenomics. If you or anyone else doesn’t have the brains or ability to think beyond the orthodoxies they’re stuck in and see that resolving those opposites is wisdom and effectiveness….it’s not my problem.

Reflects Trinity-Unity-One-Process, Start, Change and Stop, Electro-magnetic /Photonic Reality, Both the Temporal and “Quantum” Reality.

Everything one sees and experiences is an emanation of a wavelength toward one’s self awareness whereupon an internal experience of the external universe takes place. Full consciousness is the mutual oneness of light and the “light” of one’s own consciousness. This light/wavelength is a leaking forth of the electro-magnetic nature of matter resulting from the utter (love) and active (grace) integrativeness of the quantum reality/cosmos.

That describes Paul’s experience on the road to Damascus. It describes Aquinas’s beatific expression that “all that I have written is like straw compared to what has now been revealed to me.” Grace is an interpenetrative personal experience that continued throughout these individual’s lives, and reflectively, monetary grace as in gifting via a universal dividend and a retail discount are interpenetrative monetary and economic policies that will bring the major aspects of grace, namely the trinity-unity-oneness-process of balance, equilibrium and flow through time in the economy.

Keen understands the money system’s basic operation which is much more than most economists and virtually every politician, but he’s still behind the curve on both what the new philosophy of economics needs to be and also the specific policies that will greatly stabilize modern economies. His “modern debt jubilee” is actually an excellent idea, but only a one off measure. A one off measure which is actually perfectly reflective of the philosophical concept and the permanent policies required. If a system is inherently cost inflationary you can throw money into it forever and still not resolve the system’s problem. Monetary austerity is idiocy in modern economies, monetary stimulus is only capable of palliating the problem and monetary grace as in gifting directly to the individual and reciprocally to the individual and back to the merchant as retail sale is the only way to actually resolve systemic cost inflation.

That may be true now, but what if we put our heads together and built an organization that communicated to the small to medium sized business community both their self interests via the discount and, as these programs are partially funded by them, less taxation for welfare, unemployment and even social security, and also showed them how it would result in the stabilization of the economy over all via a dividend?

Economists think too much in mere economic terms. This is actually the fragmented state of modern intellectualism as a “whole”. They think merely in terms of humans as homo economicus instead of actual whole beings. Hence their narrow definition of purpose is restricted to employment and they confuse leisure with idleness, when leisure is self determined attentive activity which is the essence of edifying purpose itself. Any economics that misses or impedes this realization is by definition humanly regressive.

What we require is not economics, but a Wisdomics which would integrate economic theorizing with the long observed insights in “perennial philosophy” and that would have policies that aligned with same.