The third unifying alternative is always the wise decision. That’s why an integration of the best aspects and intentions of capitalism and socialism, namely Social Credit, is the economic answer. Just apply your willingness to vote for a political third alternative to economics and you’ll be smart and consistent.

Problems, opinions and orthodoxies being essentially dualistic states, virtually every one of them in existence remains unresolved because of

1. lack of awareness of workable third alternatives and/or
2. a rigid refusal to even consider them   Steve Hummel 10/11/2016

Would not the policies of a new economic philosophy of grace as in gifting, namely a sufficient free gift of a dividend to everyone 18 and older and a general discount to prices at retail sale that was greater than any computed rate of inflation and that was rebated back to the merchants who gave it, resolve both the requirement of continual borrowing and the contradictory paradigm of debt and loan only that Finance now uses to dominate every other business model and manipulate nations and regions?

Are they not more thorough and economically insightful solutions to the systemic scarcity of individual income as well as the answer to the creeping erosion of profits and purchasing power that inflation has had on modern economies, more so than the incomplete and so non-resolving policies of a basic income guarantee, a minimum wage increase or even QE directly to the individual ALONE ?

The answer is always an integration of only the truth(s) of opposing ideas/perspectives which simultaneously creates a new thirdness that is a greater oneness. That is what Wisdomics/Gracenomics/Social Credit is, and what economic theory needs.

10/11/2016 Steve Hummel

How much better would the world be if each of us made the will to love our most important intention and purpose? We could all have many other intentions as well, but if we just made love and loving our first and strongest intention the world could literally be transformed.  Imagine a world, your world consciously creating love toward both yourself and toward others. How much better a world would that be for your children to grow up in? How much more friendly and open to more friendship would that make your life, your neighborhood, your city and your entire society? How much more productive and prosperous could a nation’s economy be if its most basic policies were based on love, on giving and giving back. Imagine it. Imagine if we made love as in giving the most basic policies of our economic and money systems? Imagine it. Work is fine, profit is fine, but work of whatever kind, profit and an overriding policy of giving and giving back is the basis for a truly great life, a great economy and a great society.

The world is a wonderful and interesting place to live,  full of art and adventure, full of good and positive purpose and full of opportunities for friendship and joyous interaction if we’ll simply create the will to love, make the intention to love….our most basic and continual purpose. Think love as in friendliness, intend love as in caring, yell love because it’s the good and best thing to do and feel, act lovingly and you’ll find a happier life right where you’re at. And don’t forget to make sure, to be absolutely determined to say to your leaders that they must learn and apply this lesson about the importance of giving and giving back, and so make love the strongest and most overriding intention of their policies and programs. If we do that the world will transform right before our very eyes.  Love inside and loving policies outside, the way out and the way home for each of us and the nation too.

I think we’re all making a mistake here, particularly in discussing Douglas and anti-semitism. Why? Not because we desire to be closed minded and un-objective about Douglas, but because the overriding reality is that anti-semitism is one of those broadly believed and condemned ideas in society today. Thus any mention of Douglas in association with it is going to immediately make the minds of the vast majority clank shut like a jail door. And this even if Greg writes as objectively as he can. No matter the facts of Douglas’s economic and monetary insights and actions the very mention of him possibly being anti-semitic will have the effect of making Social Credit radio-active in the minds of the vast majority afflicted with the puritanical mindset, a primary aspect of which is the love of condemnation of wrong….as opposed to Grace which is love in action and upon which Social Credit is actually economically and monetarily based. The world is trapped in obsessive contention. Rather than put our heads in that never ending and impossible to win noose let us simply show how Social Credit helps everyone and all businesses that have legitimate non-dominating intentions to live more prosperously.

IMO we’re currently damned if we do and damned if we don’t with any mass media article about Social Credit. Greg confirms this with his perfectly correct observation that there are many people who have acculturated authoritarian and orthodox economic and monetary ideas. We have to begin the process of showing both the individual and the vast majority of businesses other than finance that it is in their self interests and the nation’s interests to have Social Credit. Oliver’s books are a noble effort. My book was one as well, but what is required is to crumble the current paradigm/generally held belief from inside. This is why I think an Operation Monetary Wisdom and Grace targeted at the two constituencies above is the route to go. Shortly after Barry Goldwater lost a landslide election to LBJ the eventual supreme court justice William Powell wrote what was later referred to as “The Powell Memo” that said conservatives needed to create business friendly, conservative infrastructure in the republican party, in the  mass media and in the nation’s think tanks. Thus the republican party came back from near oblivion. Social Crediters need to do the same thing. If it works for incomplete economic orthodoxy (whether of the right or left) it will work, if targeted and presented right as the true integration of the particles of truth of either side and the accomplishment of the relevant agendas of each, for Wisdomics/Gracenomics/Social Credit.

Legalism and conformism are the mindset of orthodoxy. And Grace is well considered and loving freedom from the bondage of same.     Steve Hummel 10/10/2016

The truth is the only thing that it is safe to generalize about is Grace because two of its aspects are Bothness integrated, i.e. Duality and the mental and/or physical action-process of Bothness-Andness-Oneness, i.e. Trinity-Unity. Put these two concepts/aspects together within an integrative framework of love, wisdom-discernment and action and you have described and defined both the human experience of Grace and the physical universe’s very processes as well. For instance:

[ (- charge x + charge) –> Electricity/Electro-magnetism ]

The integration of thought and action/Philosophy and policy

[ (thought  x action) –> Love ]   Grace

an object

[ (trunk x branches) –> roots ]  tree

an integrated human being

[ (Space x Time) –> Consciousness ]   Grace/a fully integrated human being

chemical process of synthesis

[ (chemical x chemical –>  third synthesized chemical state ]

the therapeutic process

[ (problem x problem) –> resolution/mental transformation process ]