The Trinitarian Model For Finance

Surely we are way over due for a re-work on the business model and system known as Finance. As David Graeber has most adequately shown us Finance has been problematic for over 5000 years. Even over on the Social Credit Google group I feel they have a bit too much of an orthodox stance on Finance and Banking. They are completely correct of course to chastise the cranky advocates of “interest is the be all and end all of our monetary problems”, however, considering the length of time that Finance/Banking/the paradigm of Debt has afflicted us and also its hiding in plain sight monopolistic dominance of every other business model and every individual in their respective nation….it’s time we kicked it in the ass, cut it off at the knees and drove a stake through its vampiric heart.

Hence my Trinitarian model for Finance. Ellen Brown, who is probably the most open monetary reformer out there both personally and theoretically has been fighting a difficult battle to institute Public Banking as a competitor to private finance. I suggested this model to her and like a couple of other things I’ve suggested to her she seems as if she’s amenable to it. Here is the model:

  1. A true central bank that was truly independent of political and economic influence/coercion first by having concrete and specific policy mandates and eventually by full constitutional separation of powers. The first of these mandates would be that it and it alone distributed money for the economic system.  In other words all loans would go through a review process by the central bank before any loan was approved. Two of its other mandates would be the computation and distribution of both a universal dividend payment directly to the individual and computation of  a discount percentage used to reduce prices below their cost at retail sale to an individual. A discount that was then fully rebated back to merchants participating in that discount program. This central bank would of course not distribute any money/reserves for economic vices like the recent de-stabilizing derivative products we have seen.
  2. Private banking,then to be referred to as private speculative banking, would henceforth consist of only the aggregation (not the leveraging) of priorly created profits and savings.
  3. Public Interest Banking would get its reserves from the central bank after appropriate review. Public Interest Banks would lend to commercial enterprises, the government and the individual. Private speculative banks would no longer have that right.  The Public Banking interest rate to commercial enterprise and individual would be somewhere between 0 and 2% (all money distributed to the Public Banks by the central bank would of course be at 0%)  Loans distributed to state and local governments as well as to the federal government would be at 0%. All profits after the payment of staff would go back to the government adding to their pool of revenue and reducing their need to tax. With the vastly increased stability, likely increased profitability and longevity of businesses that the universal dividend and discount mechanisms would create interest rates could be maintained at these low levels and the economy ought to hum along on all of its trillions of cylinders.

Post To Billy’s Blog 10/05/2015

The flaws in theory and the economic absurdities left unresolved by them are coalescing. The world is in a race between Wisdom and Destruction, evolution and paradigm change or failure to confront these necessities and at best a limping future, at worse chaos and war in an age of modern weaponry.
Paradigm changes appear to be absurdities to those with lingering orthodoxies and/or a lack of confidence to embrace Wisdom, but it is always orthodoxy that is actually the absurdity and Wisdom that invokes the needed insight.  Let us have a Wisdomics whose policies are an integration of reductionism and philosophy aligned with freedom for the individual and free flowingness of the system, and that factor all relevant truths and possibilities.

Post To Steve Keen’s YouTube Video 10/06/2015

I’m extremely tired of trying to feed you insight and then get insulted for an enthusiasm for Wisdom. Of course integrating various points of view is the answer…integration is the very process of Wisdom itself…so get on with it…and garner Wisdom. The question you need to ask yourself is….what is the pinnacle of Wisdom? There is the instruction that will answer your systemic questions…if you have the personal wisdom and confidence to embrace it.

Posts To Ellen Brown’s Forum To Stuart and John Rawson

I fully concur with that. Paradighmatic control is both more powerful, subtle and suave than heavy handed tactics. That is why it is essential to recognize and fight the current corrupted and inadequate paradigm…with a higher ethic and adequate to resolution type new paradigm.  It also exposes the necessity of starting from the source of all actions/policies, i.e. the mind/philosophy/ideas/paradigms. Once clarity is established there aligning policies with it becomes more clear as well.

That may be a largely correct observation Stuart, but it is not one that is completely true. It also why a call to a higher ethic and all encompassing new idea/paradigm is necessary in order to “call out” and provide “a place to go” for those who actually do have contrarian reservations about our foreign policy. Don’t you think?

To John Rawson

That actually echos my own observations regarding agendas, except that conflict also occurs when those who are contrarian and also have misunderstandings about the actual philosophy and policies of the theory/aspect of reform they are posting about….persist in their critiques. It results inevitably in conflict and schism. On the other hand one who intends and actually does not critique, but rather to integrate and include even apparently opposing ideas/theories/aspects of reform is actually trying to find a more unifying way of proceeding. Inclusiveness, integration and cooperation are the signatures of objectivity. Insistence on the inclusion of misunderstandings and less integrated agendas and the resulting fragmentation however, betray at least a wisp of egotism.

Post to RWER blog and poster Rhonda

Look at the relationship between total costs/prices and total individual incomes simultaneously produced with which to liquidate those total costs/prices. And then proactively craft policies that are the anatomy of equilibrium itself, i.e. effect both a + and a – to the disequilibrium discovered after that analysis, and finally that do not add an additional cost to any enterprise and  so neither to the system.

The Directness and Ending Point Necessities of A Systemic Problematic Condition

Directness (the nature of the Dividend) resolves the problem for the individual from start to finish and Ending Pointness (the Discount)  protects and enriches the business entities within the economy…and is also a catch all for unforeseen costs due to circumstances, and imperfections in the duty and honor of participating and non-participating merchants in the economy.

Grace: Peace and Duty

Grace is peace as in a release from confliction/resolution of a problem. Duty is unconflicted commitment to an ideal, but Duty can only effectively and ethically be applied to the pinnacle concept/experience of Grace which is the highest of ideals. This is why Defense which very effectively utilizes the concept of Duty, must however, always be subordinate to an ethic of Peace and a political authority that embraces that same ethic.

Grace: Salvation and Integration: Comprehensiveness of Solution

Grace is personal salvation as in the resolution of one’s core problem and a system’s core, most relevant, significant and most urgently required to be resolved problem.
An integration is the combination of the truths, applicabilities and workabilities of apparently conflicting/opposing ideas and personal or systemic states, and finally an ethic of actively/proactively desiring and seeking the highest and most comprehensive solution to the subject at hand. As integration is the process of Wisdom itself this is the definition of Wisdom as well.
Definition of Integration/Wisdom/Grace
An integration is a combination of only  truths, workabilities and applicabilities of the subject at hand, and also an ethic of actively/proactively seeking and desiring the highest and most comprehensive actual solution to that same subject. As integration is the process of Wisdom itself integration is also the means of garnering Wisdom, and as a state of grace, whether personal or systemic, is the pinnacle concept and experience of Wisdom….grace is the ultimate state and result of integration/Wisdom.

The Cosmic Code: An Integrated Trinity-Unity Encompassing An Integrated Duality

The Description of Total Reality and the Inclusion of Self Awareness, Consciousness, Wisdom and Grace In All Spheres…….Individually-Psychologically, Systemic, Scientific, Philosophical and Spiritual….so that none of these alone can claim ultimate reality, but must integrate with themselves and with such underlying reality.

It is both a Theory of Everything and a handbook for Life and Living.