Daniel: That’s not a disciplined idea for a system. It’s beyond silly.

I can’t imagine who’s paying the discount.

Me: Preferably amend The FED’s charter enabling it to simply create the money and distribute it back to the merchants who gave the discount to the consumer. One of its mandates is to control inflation after all. Every retail merchant gets an account at The FED and the money is created the same way it is now with equal debits and credits that sum to zero and the digital technology already present. Same thing would apply in distributing a universal dividend…everyone gets an account at the central bank. Its too simple for the intellectual vanities of the erudite, to world changing not too be a mega-paradigm change to the economy and money system…and too edifiying to the cynical because it woud be the greatest opportunity to self actualize gratitude for a continuing gift of money since meditation and prayer.

If Donald Trump can irrelevently recommend we re-name The Gulf of Mexico to The Gulf of America, then I recommend we bring awareness to the solution to our economic and monetary problems by changing our name from The United States of America to The United Republic For Monetary Grace As In Gifting At Retail Sale. That way with a policy of a 50% Discount/Rebate at retail sale a $500k house is reduced to $250k when you agree to buy it from the house builder and when the retail point of Finance, that is your mortgage payment comes due every first day of the month, the central bank pays for 50% of its total so you’re getting a $500k house for the equivalent payment of a $125k mortgage.

Do you think that amount of individual benefit is sellable? Then just keep broadcasting it instead of worrying about what the pols, bankers and the unfortunately acculturatedly cynical but well meaning may mistake about its temporal universe effects or its lack of sellability.

Paradigms Versus Palliatives

Paradigmology

The Cosmic Code: Trinity/Thirdness Greater Oneness Of A Problematic Duality

The short story is Learning The Wisdom of Grace. The rest of the story proceeds,

You’re quite right. The enlightenment was an incomplete zietgeist change that enabled the bathwater of prescientific religious dogma to be increasingly replaced by the monopoly paradigm for intellectual inquiry AKA Science Only instead of helping us self actualize spirituality/the natural philosophical concept and experience of grace. Religious dogmas are mistaking the map of spirituality for its actual topography.

I’m sure that is a sarcastic reply, but until robotics and AI eliminate a high percentage of employment it would destroy the economic impulse which is unbalanced. Once that happens you’ll need to have the acculturation of a Paid Required Positive Purpose(s) Policy fill in people’s time that employment formerly did. As I have pointed out here before the beneficial and progressive aspects of every historical paradigm change have always been an aspect or aspects of the natural philosophical concept of grace. Balance, free flowingness and (higher) purpose are all aspects of grace. Finally, in the temporal/time universe you have to have a problem before you can craft a solution at least until you’re up to being conscious enough to self actualize grace on your own. Prematurely throwing people into the chaos of purposelessness is just the equally unwise flip side of domination by Finance’s monopoly paradigm of Debt Only.

Musk is an orthodox libertarian and so believes economic delusions and additionally does not understand the money system. The economic and monetary solution to our problems is the 50% Discount/Rebate policy at retail sale because the discount doubles everyone’s purchasing power by implementing beneficial price and asset deflation BY ADDING MONEY TO THE ECONOMY…THE HEADS OF THE ORTHODOX EXPLODE AND THE QUANTITY THEORY OF MONEY IS RESIGNED TO THE DUST BIN OF HISTORY. Meanwhile, with the FED simply creating the money (not treasuries) of the rebate aspect of the policy the commercial agent gets their full price so no moral hazard there and the interest factor, which isn’t actually the problem the libertarians and also the democrats love to demagogue BECAUSE THAT INTEREST IS ACTUALLY A PAYMENT TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND HENCE A PART OF GDP.

The idea that they have their consumer’s best interests in mind. And thats why the new Department of Competition, Innovation and The Public’s Bully Pulpit would be so effective because if they simply inflated/committed “greedflation” at its weekly news conference they would get the finger pointed at that anti-social act and the public would be asked what they were going to do about it.