The Cosmic Code/Grace: Bothness and Bothness/Andness/Oneness

Traditionally the state of Grace has been a religious concept and experience. However, the state and process is actually an accurate description of not only the best mindset of science, but the utterly integrated basic state of the cosmos, namely the quantum universe.

In the quantum universe particles come into being and go out of being in exactly the same way that thoughts come into being and go out of being within ourselves. This also describes the actual action of our attention which reaches out to one perception then withdraws that attention and places it onto another. The attentive process is the same whether it is another thought or another temporal perception. And this is a seamless, flowing process….that is unfortunately not as conscious as it can be.

Grace is the utterly integrated state of the cosmos…of which we are an integrated and awakening part.

Grace as normally perceived in the temporal universe as the dualistic scientific observation of differing factors and the deciphering of whether or not it supports or negates a hypothesis. In other words it is an integrative process for the seeking of truth.

If one combines the integrative scientific process of science with the equally integrative observation that our consciousness itself is a reflection of the ultimate underlying quantum reality we get a synthesis/integrative/integrated state that can be formulated as The Cosmic Code:

[ (A x B) i.e. the integrated dualistic scientific process, a bothness,    <-> i.e. a continual integrative process,  of G/C Grace/Consciousness, i.e the utterly integrated/integrating, underlying and primary state the quantum universe, and finally, ], that is the entire formula which is an accurate synthesized description of the integrated/integrating/integrative character of a bothness and a bothness/andness and which is also simultaneously a description of their oneness. 

[ ( A x B <-> C/G ]  

Somehow The Third Way Must Get Presented To Trump

So that hopefully he can see that the tired old orthodoxies of both the left and right are woefully inadequate in an age of ever increasing capital appreciation and the erosion of employment/individual incomes due to artificial intelligence.
Or a movement to present it to the small to medium sized business community, to students, to the 30-40% of those who will lose their jobs due to AI etc. All three of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and President Obama have uttered the word gracious in the last few hours. They and as many as possible need to realize that grace/graciousness is not just the momentary solution, but the continuing and temporal policy one as well. The third and higher way is and always has been the way.
OH:  Well said!
GM:  Good thinking. This election rejected not just Hillary but an old establishment and worldview.  It is anti-globalization, anti-neoliberlism, etc.  In context with Brexit.  Time not just to turn a new page but toss the old book out the window.  White college grads, aka the most fully indoctrinated, broke for Hillary, Les Mis for Trump.  He really ran on Pat Buchanan’s old platform and now formerly taboo topics are front and center.
Me:  Thanks Oliver, and thank you too Greg. Yes, the trick will be to get Trump to see that orthodox stimulation of the economy like he has put forth for infrastructure etc. while making the economy improve somewhat still will not resolve the underlying macro-economic problems identified by Douglas. Trump being a political outsider and hopefully being interested in real change might be able to understand the difference between palliatives and ultimate solutions. I’m not holding my breathe for him to see the truth of the third resolving way, but Trump is a gambler and likes being thought of as an innovator….so if he went for it and worked to get Social Credit policies implemented he’d probably be considered right up there with political luminaries like Lincoln and Washington. And that possibility is how it should be marketed to him. Again the trick will be getting past all of the mandarins buffering him from such possibilities while slandering the intelligent holistic third way.
The position to watch is Secretary of the Treasury. When Obama made Timothy Geithner  treasury secretary you knew something like monetary grace as in gifting was never getting to his (the president’s) ear. Actually there are people unconscious of the freeing aspects of the concept of grace all over the political (and general)  landscape.  The best hope to change that is someone publishes a best selling book that declares that power, and so awakens everyone to the unethically naked domination of the economic and financial emperors.
GM:  There’s Buzz that Jamie Simon is on treas sec shortlist
Me:  Jamie Dimon and  Steven Mnuchin would both probably consider SC completely anathema.  Being JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs  alumni will have molded their minds to current macro orthodoxy, or worse the aberrated general equilibrium mindset of derivative and casino capitalism.   It would literally take a “road to Damascus” incident for these types to see the efficacy of SC. This is the problem with orthodoxies…they become habitual and hence one loses contact with the present moment. The present moment and the continuing flow of moments being integral aspects of the experience of Grace tends to undo orthodoxy and its negative  qualities.
As for the Clintons or Obama no indication any have heard of it, and even if they have, some aspect of current economic orthodoxy would undoubtedly close their minds to it. Shortly after he took office Obama came out with the de-bunked idea that there was a positive “multiplier effect” to individual incomes from injection of spending (the only way incomes can possibly equal costs is direct distribution to the individual, i.e. the dividend and reciprocal gifting at retail sale, i.e. the discount).
Steve Bannon, if being considered for chief of staff, (chief of staff is usually the ultimate filterer of information that actually gets to the president), would be a complete disaster for any hope of getting SC to Trump. First of all he’s out to destroy the left (destroy and transcend are not the same thing and the latter is what SC would do to the left) and secondly he’s such an orthodox alt-rightist that he would undoubtedly make the mistake of associating Social Credit with socialism which is an ultimate misunderstanding of SC.
OH:  Yes, Social Credit would transcend the left and the right … enough of these silly false paradigms and the perpetual and fruitless conflicts they engender. Time for the radical centre.
Me:   Yes, Social Credit is the ultimate and strengthening radical centre, the genuine third way, the reflection of the concept of Trinity-Unity-Oneness and the economic integration of the best essence of both capitalism and socialism, namely dynamic and cost effective profit making systems and the intention of abundant economic and monetary democracy. And integration/Wisdom and its ultimate pinnacle concept Grace is a two edged sword so it cuts in truth and cuts out untruth. Hence it cuts out cut throat inhumane and unethical capitalism and socialistic re-distributive taxation, cuts out the dominating and monopolistic rule of private finance and totalitarian governmental tyranny, etc. etc. etc.
WK:  I have little respect for political party power politics, per se, am not an American and have very different belief system than that of the Democrats and Republicans (Liberals and Conservatives), and for the divisive and false Left-Right dichotomy prevailing around the world.  I support Donald Trump for his independence and declared repudiation of the whole ensconced, corrupt financial and political Establishment supported by a complicit and compliant media.  If he continues to operate in accordance with the defective and exploitative orthodox system of Banking, debt and erroneous national cost accountancy, then his Administration will fall upon the shoals of financial ignorance as do virtually all Governments in time.  If he adopts sane and sound financial policy his Administration will enable the real credit, i..e., the ability of the American economy to deliver  goods and services as, when and where required or desired, with increasing leisure, on an almost miraculous scale of achievement.
GM:  Trump has broken the old Washington consensus, and threatened a status quo whose elites of course loathe him.  He is a populist above all. The populace is no longer swallowing the old kant.
Me:  Yes, but we need to never forget that the third way is the wise way. Wisdom is the integration of truths…and the deletion of untruths….on both sides.  That’s what makes Social Credit the answer…because it is par excel-lance integrative and so wise. In fact it is an entirely third thing from mere capitalism or socialism, it is grace applied to the economic and money systems.
WK:  True, but it is up to us to find a way to make our point with those who might be willing to listen and who might be in a position to exercise the required influence.
Me:  Yes, and I’m all for that. I think we should try also try my idea of an Operation Applied Economic and Monetary Grace. No one has given any feedback regarding such an attempt to influence major constituencies like the small to medium sized business community, students and the general public. What is referred to as The Powell Memo, a letter written after Barry Goldwater’s devastating defeat by LBJ by William J. Powell, Jr. who went on to become a supreme court justice. The letter suggested that conservatives start a grass roots movement of entering and influencing groups and positions in order to stop  socialist thinking. Conservatives elected Richard Nixon in two elections only 4 years later…but 50 years later here we are in the same contentious soup. The third integrative way requires “a new Powell memo”.

Posted To Billy Mitchell’s MMT Blog Regarding Minsky’s Financial Mindset and Theories…and My Speaking Truth To MMT Power

I have complimented Steve Keen numerous times for his iconoclastic de-bunking of neo-liberal economics, but have also always told him that Minsky’s instability/ponzi finance hypothesis was more observation of inevitable human psychological flaw than systemic insight. MMT is aligned with my thinking because it would make money more abundant. The problem with it however, is that the money is not direct to the individual, and when one factors in the disruptive force of AI which I do not see as avoidable or compensate-able within any present economic orthodoxy ….and that makes the policies of Wisdomics/Gracenomics/Social Credit not only relevant but necessary….and if you understand that employment is a rather small set of possible positive purposes…..they are the more enlightened path forward for humanity.

Phil:  Please do tell us why you think Minsky changed his mind. It seems very odd.

Me:   @Phil

Because if you leave even an unconscious toe of your mind in the monetary paradigms of debt, scarcity and indirectness their real but merely apparent realities will eventually re-hypnotize and re-habituate you to their apparentcy, and consequently you’ll begin to think they are THE workable monetary solution instead of the deeper truth that integrating the paradigms of gifting, abundance and directness into the system are what is necessary.

Define and Contemplate Wisdom and Grace

The combination of existing and inevitable factors will mean the policies of Social Credit must be implemented. Otherwise it’s eventual collapse due to either stubborn orthodoxy and/or palliative measures. And even if Social Credit policies themselves are implemented, it’s still then a matter of Social Credit thoroughly aligned with abundance, action/process and love….the three of which define Grace.

1, 2 and 3

Most are 1) thoroughly stuck in obsessive Dualism, 2) a few stumble onto the third way and 3) very,very few consciously pursue Trinity-Unity-Oneness-Process.

Again, three realities integrated is the actual and complete reality.

Election Day 11/08/2016

I see nothing but erudite Duncie-ness all around. If we don’t do the integrative monetary and economic policy thing any orthodox policy on either side will backfire. I hold my nose and vote for the side that has the more gracious tendencies attending it, but again until either side awakens to Wisdom we will continue to march toward a greater collapse.

Destructive creativity is what must be avoided. Creative and WISE destruction….and the ability to discern the difference between those two can get us through this mess.