Intro To The Cosmic Code

The Cosmic Code is science and spirituality, apparency and actuality, complexity-deepness and simplicity itself, intention, counter intention and resolution, trouble, obsession with it and the freedom of grace, space, time and self awareness, duality, trinity and unity-oneness all at the same time and everything and its opposite exquisitely integrated. And being cosmic it is all around us at all times. All we have to do is train ourselves to see it and experience it.  Let us explore it.

Wisdom/Paradigms/Paradigm Perception: The Ultimate Integrative/Synthesizing Idea and Mindset

There is a difference between the garden variety moment to moment state of consciousness and the one that creates and is Wisdom and so can more easily perceive and fully understand integrative/synthesizing concepts like paradigms. Integration/mental synthesis of truths is the very process of Wisdom, and paradigms are single unifying concepts that change/create/fully integrate into whole new patterns. Hence they combinatory and decentralized ideas and thinking….at the same time.

Posted To RWER Blog 06/18/2018: Upon Viewing My 203rd Steve Keen Video

Me:  Actually Helen they do have some half baked and not thoroughly informed policies as enumerated in this blog post:

Upon Viewing my 203rd Steve Keen Video
So far as economics is concerned you can’t get any more basic than the point of exchange itself, and any more integrative than the infrastructure upon which all exchange takes place and is accounted for than double entry bookkeeping…..and economists do not look/do not go there….and so do not discern the monetary and economic significances to be found at these points in time and with that discipline.

Keen, who is the best of the heterodox economists and from whom I have learned much so far as correct macro-economics is concerned….still has not crashed through the haze of the monopolistic and parasitic paradigm of Debt Only by looking where I have been suggesting he look for like 4-5 years.

He also hasn’t taken my advice and started a mass movement by and for the individual and the small to medium sized business community because they are both who the policies I suggest will benefit from the most and also the constituencies big enough to herd the politicians toward implementation of them. He’s still trying to convince a very small constituency of academics who are egocentrically opposed to him….despite continually quoting Max Planck about how “science advances one funeral at a time.” I don’t get it.

Then he suggests debt write downs/debt jubilee as a policy despite it being only of a one off STATIC nature, the character of which he has long opposed in his correct de-bunking of DSGE.

He also advocates UBI/universal dividend even though he apparently has no idea from where and when it originated, and also has none but orthodox ideas about how to finance it so that it would be effective instead of an eventual opportunity for regressive thinkers to critique and reverse it….because despite liberal orthodoxy it would inevitably cause inflation….because money itself is not the operant factor in “monetary” inflation.

Finally, he has absolutely no idea of how to synergize the positive effects of a universal dividend with discount/rebate policies throughout the entire economic process and at its terminal ending point.

I’m tired of otherwise smart guys being such blinkered and shallow thinking mere theorists and reformers when if they took the closer look, had paradigm perception and had the guts and intelligence to step out and oppose Finance in a politically savvy way they’d actually change the world.

So I guess I have to do that myself.

******************************************

P:  I have often noticed that people who are older than 25 or so and who never learned to drive a car are very likely to never learn to drive. Indeed I have seen such people bridle at the suggestion they should learn even though driving is, well, useful if not necessary.
I believe this is true for those who never learned in their youth about ordinary differential equations, coupled ordinary differential equations, or nonlinear coupled differential equations. When I see Steve Keen kajoling Paul Krugman to consider learning about this and Krugman’s reaction against learning this important math skill I see poor Keen shocked to see the same reaction I have seen in one who is too old to learn how to drive.

Me:  Keen is good at looking at problems like the fact that neo-liberalism is incorrect in using only linear equations. He’s not so good at perceiving either the current problematic paradigm of Finance, namely Debt/Burden as virtually the only vehicle and form for the distribution of credit/money, or the new paradigm of Direct and Reciprocal Monetary Gifting.

Also, being somewhat overly abstract as nearly all economists are he doesn’t contemplate the present time actions of commerce (exchange). Nor does he have a good understanding of the digital nature of the discipline that underlies that exchange and how that nature could be utilized to linearize tremendously beneficial monetary and economic policy effects DIRECTLY to the individual AND RECIPROCALLY to enterprise.

Hence he’s still trapped within the current paradigm and can only suggest “epicycle” policies instead of realizing the paradigm changing ones derived from directly looking at the above.

Posted To Coppola Comment 06/17/2018

Make that a relatively ABUNDANT basic income by also implementing a 50% price discount/rebate policy at the point of sale throughout the entirety of the economic process as well as the same policy at retail sale…..and you’ll be able to create a truly free flowing economy.

And instead of obsessing over their possible flaws we should instead acculturate people to leisure which is NOT idleness, but rather self chosen focused and purposeful activity.

Prayer

It is correct that prayer is talking to oneself, but along with action to bring about what is right and ethical…..it is the only sane action to keep yourself from being consumed by your own and other’s ignorance and ill will.

The Stupidity of the Laziness/Dependence Hypothesis

You have laziness/dependency now with austerity. With general guaranteed abundance we will of course anecdotally have some of the same, but far, far less….if we also do the obviously intelligent thing of thoroughgoingly acculturating positive and constructive purposefullness within leisure….which is NOT ideleness, but rather self chosen directed and focused activity.

Direct Looking At The Economy Enables One To Define Its Actual Current Character

Conservative and Libertarian economists think the economy tends toward equilibrium and that markets are free. Not so.

Liberal economists think they are financially unstable. That’s going in the right direction, but its sight is still blinkered and blurred largely because heterodox economists have not recognized the concept and policies of the new paradigm and hence they still think private finance is a legitimate economic business model which it is not.

The truth is that the economy/markets are bounded neither on the lower end by costs nor the upper bound by price which is the definition of chaos/no actual control.  Private finance and its monopolistic/parasitical paradigm of Debt Only as the sole vehicle and form for the distribution of credit/money is outside of the legitimate economic/productive process and dominatingly attempts to smother/manipulate the economy into “equilibrium” with the blunt instruments of interest rates and refusals to lend. The strategically implemented philosophy and policies of the new paradigm resolve the paradoxes and conundrums that stymie the heterodox’s thinking, clear their minds of falsehoods and filters and accomplish the establishment of that new paradigm.

New Policy

Every enterprise that doesn’t inflate their (monthly) prices or actually cuts their prices will receive a percentage gift of their net profits. Those that raise their prices without legitimate additional costs will have punishment from taxation to being denied their discount/rebate privileges.