One’s level, one’s depth of understanding is monitored by their mode/modes of thought. Reading can lead to education, expanded reading as well as repetitive study leads to its furtherance, but the way to really understand anything is to contemplate it, that is  look thoughtfully for a long time at, think profoundly and at length; meditate on it. Just to be integrative I think the best form of contemplation is what I would call deep contemplative analysis which combines both the reductive scientific mode and a prayerful mode as well. That way one not only deepens one understanding and even experience of something, it also insures that one contemplates as many of the aspects of that something as one currently knows. Thus it is both a deepening and a broadening at the same time.

It’s a failure to integrate both opposites [ (A x B) and what results from the process of integration itself, a thirdness that is more unified and whole,   <->  G/C ]  or:

[ ( A x B)  <->  G/C ]   The Cosmic Code

If you don’t integrate the particles of truth in opposing theories you fall back into mere Duality and its inevitable habit of egoistic contention thus missing the thirdness/additive concepts  of Trinity and grace and the oneness concept of consciousness. You also remain unconscious of the result of actual integration which is the graciously non-egoistic thirdness that is also a greater unified whole that is neither one or the other of the Duality. And without an actual integration the particle of truth ignored, missed, deleted on either side or the particle of untruth incorrectly included always comes back to refute the theory because there is no gracious flow, free flowingness, unity and completeness

The underlying factor in The Cosmic Code and in all actual progress-process is the concept of grace in any/all of its aspects which is synonymous with human consciousness itself, and the integration of both an integrated Duality and the integrative Trinity-Unity-Oneness concept of Grace…defines the formula of The Cosmic Code.

The Cosmic Code brings both Grace and Consciousness to whatever it is applied to, and in the present specific and most urgent case, to the economic and monetary systems.

Steve Keen has transcended General Equilibrium, but is only partially conscious of the concept of grace being the solution to economic stability and the end of financial monopoly/tyranny.

Mish Shedlock  is Austrian/Libertarian so he believes the market is disequilibrated by government policy, but still believes the market will equilibrate if we just leave it alone. He is also philosophically opposed to monetary gifting as Austrians/Libertarians are ideologically hide bound to the slogan, “There ain’t no free lunch-gift.”

So they partially miss/reject the concept of grace as in monetary and economic gifting. They’re both also missing/rejecting the concept of thirdness-unity-oneness and the Integrated Duality Within an Integrative Trinity-Unity-Oneness-Action-Process of The Cosmic Code. Keen probably on his belief in science and belief in the irrelevance of spirituality even though good science is the Trinity-Unity-Oneness of:

[ ( the dualistic process of comparing data)  <->  A truly open mind ]   and good spirituality is expressed thusly:

[ (Spiritual Beliefs x Belief in Grace as in tolerance and understanding) <-> Graciousness ]

And again, Shedlock is philosophically and economically opposed to the concept of gifting so it’s a complete non-starter with him.

The Church does not separate a proper regard for temporal welfare from solicitude for the eternal. If she subordinates the former to the latter according to the words of her divine Founder, “Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and His justice, and all these things shall be added unto you,”[18] she is nevertheless so far from being unconcerned with human affairs, so far from hindering civil progress and material advancement, that she actually fosters and promotes them in the most sensible and efficacious manner. Thus even in the sphere of social-economics, although the Church has never proposed a definite technical system, since this is not her field, she has nevertheless clearly outlined the guiding principles which, while susceptible of varied concrete applications according to the diversified conditions of times and places and peoples, indicate the safe way of securing the happy progress of society.

Me:  This is my view as well. The operant  point is the contemplation and application of Grace-graciousness which is Love in action both internally and in the physical temporal universe.

[(C. H. Douglas x Steve Hummel)  <->  Wisdomics-Gracenomics]

Actually that is just a fanciful sci-fi analogy. You could also do the Christianity-Spirituality analogy:

[ Christianity  x  C. H. Douglas)  <->  Social Credit ]    and

[ (Trinity-Unity-Oneness of Christianity and reflections of same and/or parts of same in all other wisdom traditions  X  Steve Hummel)  <->  Wisdomics-Gracenomics ]

It’s simply a further integration of factors utilizing and fitting within the Cosmic Code formula describing Grace…which of course both Social Credit and Wisdomics-Gracenomics are aligned with and based.

Choose, Decide to end the never ending fight between capitalism and socialism! Choose, decide to integrate their truths and best aspects and create a third more free, more profitable and more stable system! Choose, Decide to apply grace as in gifting to the economic and monetary systems!

The problem is we have 1) financial monopoly, and the consequent economic instability, 2) a coalescence of monopolistic financial integration while the economic disintegration continues and 3) dueling rigid and arrogant orthodoxies regarding the resolution of the economic and financial monopoly.

Thus we have 1) present monopoly 2) trending monopoly and 3) dualistic refusal to even consider a third way that integrates the particle of truth in both sides and thus ends the financial monopoly. Thus we have stops on 3 above, that is Starting,  2 above, Changing and 1 above, Stopping/ending the key and basic economic problem, namely the financial monopoly.

Finally, we could have a continual process of Starting, Changing and Stopping while being “boiled in oil” via a slow deflationary trend of for decades that has many “hopeful”ups and hope destroying downs, the whole while remaining in the full stop monopolistic situation described above. This is what Finance probably hopes it can pull off, themselves making money all along exploiting every dip and tick.

Or we could enable markets to act as equilibrium theorists BELIEVE they do and thus have both wonderful prosperity for everyone and a general tendency toward equilibrium…..if we’d only 1) Start by dropping our BELIEF in general equilibrium and 2) Change by implementing a universal dividend and a retail discount. That way we could 3) Stop having a scarcity of demand, Stop having a financial monopoly that prevents a direct gift of money to the individual that resolves the scarcity of demand and Stop the oppressive burden on businesses of having to get full costs plus a profit while there is a systemic scarcity of demand.

When you actually look at the policies themselves and their effects it’s really a simple 1, 2, 3 process that serves 1) the individual, 2) systemic freedom and 3) the break up of the present virtual monopoly on credit creation and the absolute restriction on the vehicle for the distribution of credit, i.e. loan only and for production only.

Consciously and consciousness speaking that is what we do, at least when one gets into and practices integration on a continuing basis. Our consciousness can be and inherently is a seamless flow of awarenesses, perceptual flow and if awareness is integrating opposites in correct and honest ways is a seamless flow of transformations.