Arnon: The routine assumption of competency in leadership must be challenged to maintain organizational health, but must mutation also be limited lest it destroys the organization as a whole. This tension leads to conundrums: How do you determine if any mutation of organization is disease or healing?

Me: No, because wisdom insights/paradigm changes are not simply dualistically creation/destruction phenomena, but are instead integrations of opposites but to the point of thirdness greater oneness beneficial effects of applied concepts in conflict with each other, IOW syntheses. Consult chemistry and Hegel as references.

Arnon: Isn’t the American Constitutional structure a legal code that supports the whole Capitalist experiment, balancing individual autonomy with collective well-being?

Me: Largely yes, but because the current monetary and economic paradigm itself has until now remained mostly unconscious as well as how to best apply its beneficial effects. But with the new paradigm of Strategic Monetary Gifting being discovered and how its primary policy of a 50% Discount/Rebate at the various points of retail sale throughout the economic process, actually implements the new paradigm…because everyone must and does participate in retail sale. So its all about the new monetary and economic paradigm and how its applied. Got it?

Finally, your assertion that Sun Tsu isn’t relevant to this discussion is false as I have previously shown. War and politics are alike conflicts. The solution is proactively implementing the new paradigm…with post haste.

Steve Hummel 09/04/2026