Arguing for reform as opposed to paradigm change does not make any sense to me as a paradigm change is a permanent progression while reforms are easily gamed and hence negated or even reversed as we saw Keynesianism go to the neo-classical “synthesis”.

With economics and money systems, as every individual is a culture unto themselves, better that we have a paradigm change that inverts the top down one size fits all character of cults/cultures into assured economic and monetary freedom where each individual can create their own ideal scene/utopia.