Disequilibrium Theory vs Monetary Paradigm Change

Disequilibrium theory is good and incrementally better than previous theories, but Monetary Paradigm Change follows the problem and primacy inversion signature of all actual paradigm changes (Hunting and Gathering Movement to Agriculture staying fixed in an area, and Ptolemaic epicycle to  Copernican Helio-centric paradigm changes), and so the changes are actually general,  integrative and transformative of all factors greatly stabilizing the area in which the new paradigm applies.

Equilibrium theory is like the curve of a failed satellite orbital insertion, disequilibrium is a little more extended suborbital curve and a monetary paradigm curve is a greatly stabilized free fall, free flowing orbital curve that may have perturbations in it but, again, is far and away more stabilized.

Also, the true test that something is a paradigm change is that everything adapts to it, not the other way around.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s