+ and – are the component parts of an economic equilibrium. However, [ (+ and -) +,- ] is also an equilibrium, a higher, a more economically conscious equilibrium.

For instance let’s say that the economy, because it is utterly embedded in the even larger temporal/physical universe reality, must obey the laws of thermo-dynamics and so expends energy in the process of producing something. And of course energy has a cost, so there is more cost energy-wise built into the very process of production itself than is readily observed. Another more observable way to see this is when a business borrows $1 million to start producing and $600k of that is involved in actually building the building and the machines that produce their product. Now this building and machines wear out and have to be replaced so the costs the businessman has to get from the prices he charges his customers is actually $1.6 million, so again more costs are created in the process of producing something…than total money distributed….to pay for that production. It creates a moment to moment monetary and economic ratio and reality that looks like the following:

Total Costs/Prices (1 +n)

Total (possible, but actual) individual incomes (n)

And so there is not only a ratio of a scarcity of total individual incomes to total costs, but these costs build up over time and so “gum up” the entire system. Now, enter the Banker “doing God’s work.” (Actually he is more into being the economic God than actually doing God’s work,…because God’s/Consciousness’s  work/intention after all is Grace, right?) The Banker is happy (generally) to loan the business more money, but of course he charges a cost for that so the total costs in the system are never actually totally paid, and all of this continuous borrowing builds up…and so things tend to go downhill, businesses and individuals suffer and the Banker doesn’t get paid all of the time either. (Dang it!)

Now if we were to GIVE the individual a + of income on a continual basis that would make total incomes continually produced come closer to total costs simultaneously being created. But wait, …the system itself still tends to create more costs than incomes, so in order to actually have a (+,-) flow/equilibrium you have to have a mechanism for a -/reduction to costs. So if we reduced prices at the very end of the economic process at retail sale with a discount to prices to the consumer, i.e. everybody, and that was rebated back to the businesses that gave the discount….we could have a (+,-) equilibrium. But wait, everything done so far is merely regarding the economic system which is embedded within an even larger temporal/physical universe which on a cosmic scale and because of the laws of thermo-dynamics abhors a stasis/equilibrium and so still tends toward the above disequilibrium ratio. In other words it doesn’t like/doesn’t actually allow an equilibrium to exist through time …..even if you equate all of the numbers! Which means, if you want to put the economic and monetary systems on auto pilot/an actual free flow the only way to do it is to create “the higher disequilibrium” of MORE total individual incomes in ratio to total costs. (And of course just to be completely integrative, real and wise you’ll want to keep your eye on those systems also because….shit happens!)

THAT would proactively “get ahead of the curve”….of even the laws of thermo-dynamics and perfectly reflect God/Grace/Consciousness/negative entropy. And that could be expressed like this:

[( + and – ) +,- ]

where ( +, – ) is an “equilibrium” within the laws of thermo-dynamics and [( +, – ) +,- ] is the negative entropy monetary, economic and consciousness….balancing answer to that “equilibrium”.