After one has satisfactorily determined that inherent additional costs are a reality right along with inevitable diminutions of same from the circular flow, and  that one cannot remedy the problem this causes by simply injecting more and more money into the system because it re-initiates the problem….another problem can arise of not fully perceiving the efficacy and macro-economic power of the Social Credit policy mechanisms. Orthodox thinking regarding equilibrium can begin to creep in and pecuniary notions about the amount of the Dividend or percentage of the Discount can actually snatch failure from the mouth of victory. One has to think that if the system has persisted in a state of individual monetary scarcity for so long and yet survived….how much better could it be if an abundant income that aligns with Social Credit’s key philosophical concept of Grace was immediately made the reality. Perfect statistical and/or macro-economic equilibrium is likely not possible, but the + and – aspects of the Dividend and Discount policies perfectly reflects the creditary nature of the money system, perfectly addresses the key disequilibrating metric and also perfectly reflects the component parts of an equilibrium as in balance as well. But why be obsessive about numerical equilibrium which Douglas himself said was virtually impossible and incorrect because of the inherent scarcity of the economy. Instead we should align the Dividend and Discount effects with abundance which reflects Grace as in abundance. The more individual income the less need for borrowing. The lower prices are the closer we are to the money system being a ticketing system for the distribution of production. More is almost always better and ascendant. That’s why Grace is higher, superlative and abundant.