The best economists now embrace complexity, or attempt to and fail to make sense out of it, rather than look at the empirical monetary data found in the three and four dimensional cost accounting statistics that every business compiles, recognizing the disequilibrated economic relationships and conditions there and crafting policies to correct it or even reverse its trends toward more freedom and free flowingness. Recently some economists have waded through the bulk of this complexity and come to the same conclusion as C. H. Douglas came to by empirical examination of the data, namely disequilibrium. As Grace is achievable by both the clarity of an intense and focused experience of conscious awareness of self in the midst of the constant flux of possible thoughts and experiences in the moment, and also the clarity achieved by observation, integration and cognition of truth, either of the subjective or objective routes to such clarity is possible. The one (subjective) is generally the much faster route to cognition as it is less ponderous and cautious but again, either way can be the route to the same insight.

However, the true test of economists and economic theories is the policy recommendations they make  as a result of their conclusions which generally monitors their view of themselves and others as well as their personal sense of ethics. And that is where an awareness of Grace as in graciousness becomes so very important.