Fallacies of composition only occur where the philosophy of an economic system is inadequate/not comprehensively human-humane/not theoretically accurate and encompassing enough to resolve them/make them irrelevant. A system based on an ethic that was a comprehensive analysis of man, that encompassed the entire economy and monetary system while also focusing on the exact and deepest problems of the economy and money system with policies that directly and immediately resolved them, and included all of man’s legitimate economic purposes….would not have any fallacies of composition. They would be eliminated by the comprehensiveness and completely human character of the system. The way to do this is invert the current theoretics, which works from the abstract incompletely toward the individual, and instead craft policy for the individual first.

Thus the problem of the fallacy of composition wherein sovereign governments are incorrectly treated like individuals while still inverted is indeed a fallacy of composition, but the way to resolve the problem is treat the individual as sovereign by meeting his/her needs with policy first, and then construct the system on up to enterprise and to government based on the same philosophy.

Thus Wisdomics/Gracenomics.

Vulgar and hierarchical systems like Finance Capitalism or an equally vulgar and hierarchical Socialism would be both encompassed and transformed by this inversion of sovereignty and the philosophy and aligned policies of Wisdomics/Gracenomics. It is actually only deciphering the correct and comprehensive enough concept to align policy with….that is the problem. And seeings how Wisdom is the integrative/inclusive process itself and Grace its highest (and actually transformative) concept, it follows that natural Wisdom unto natural Grace ought be both the best process and the best goal of the economic and monetary systems….to align policy with.

Again,….thus Wisdomics/Gracenomics