Isn’t the alleged irrelevance of public debt costs very similar to the argument that depreciation reduces the costs of business’ necessity to replace equipment, facilities etc. …which on the one hand is true, but at the same time…ongoingly, if they are smart and frugal as competitive businesses are…and probably want to survive they still have to come up with all of the money to replace said equipment etc., anyway, the costs of which they will of course ongoingly pass on to the consumer. And throughout the process the individual is not credited with any additional income so that those additional costs/prices actually can be liquidated. In other words the individual gets no consideration or monetary help….which is the point of Social Credit and the exact reality and whole problem. And if they don’t pass on those costs in an ongoing fashion it’s probably bye, bye business when the time comes that they have to finance all of the costs of replacing everything. Businesses have it hard too. Not so hard as the individual, but with A + B the ever present and onerous reality, they suffer under it as well. That’s why businesses, particularly small to medium ones, are natural allies with consumers, for the implementation of Social Credit.