Hence, depending upon the productive capabilities of a modern economy, the Dividend could be arbitrarily set at a specific amount that guaranteed “a middle class lifestyle” whether one worked or not and of course income from work for pay would make one’s level of abundance even greater, and the Discount would macro-economically equate the costs of consumption and production regardless.
Now the numerical amount of the universal dividend could be somewhat adjusted downward as the redundancy of welfare, unemployment insurance and social security taxes were eliminated, freeing up those amounts of individual purchasing power to working individuals in the process of such elimination of taxation. And as innovation, artificial intelligence and productivity continued to lower prices the dividend could also continually be a smaller amount, but again, with the policies of Social Credit themselves creating a mathematical equilibrium the amount of the Dividend is actually not dependent upon some sparse/austere figure that “merely” approximates some smallish gap, but rather could be a figure that guaranteed the relative abundance of “a middle class lifestyle” for all and greater abundance for those also working.
There is no such thing as scarce Grace, or scarcity, austerity and pecuniary economic conditions in a modern economy based on policies aligned with and reflecting Grace.
Social Credit/Wisdomics/Gracenomics/ Gracientialism 