Steven: This article sets the US drive for global hegemony in its proper context. Couple it with Hudson’s Why the U.S. has Launched a New Financial World War — And How the the Rest of the World Will Fight Back and it becomes clear why simply printing more money is not the answer – even if it is used to fund a universal basic income / social credit for the West’s fair-skinned and increasingly “useless eater” (thanks to its money-lending class) population.
Me: As I’ve said on here several times I’ve always liked Michael Hudson, but he hasn’t comprehended the elegant encompassing aspects of Social Credit’s DUAL policies any more than any other economist whose mind is still captured by the current paradigm.
The Discount mechanism of Social Credit is what really makes Social Credit what is required…because it can be used to revive and direct money to the traditionally productive part of the economy and to downsize the necessity of finance at the same time, and Wisdomics/Gracenomics in fully recognizing the digital nature of the money system and the strategic placement of that policy at the exact point where the economic process ends, extends the discount mechanism to make the economy trend continually toward price deflation….and yet does so seamlessly within a profit making system that frees both business and the individual from dominance and enslavement by finance. In other words if the dividend enables one to live relatively comfortably and the discount also increases one’s purchasing power by say 30-40%…why hell, with a little forbearance you may not even have to finance a car or home, or if you’re really impatient at least you’ll be able to afford a lot shorter term for that financing. And the productive part of the economy can run smoothly on all cylinders in perpetuity because there’s no longer any scarcity of demand due to the dividend, plus you get your full best competitive price even despite the discount…because your discounts are fully rebated back to you. It’s win-win for everyone…except finance whose market is continually being downsized by these policies and by the innovation the value of which finance has been usurping for the last couple of centuries.
Monetary Grace as in Gifting….it’s the new economic and monetary paradigm.
Steven: It is way past time for a little ‘tell it like it is’ truth telling. Perhaps the Swiss would like the rest of the world to follow the American example of employing workers made redundant by automation to be employed in the armed services industry, making and learning how to use the latest killing technology to threaten their neighbors and / or the rest of the world?
Call it what you will – Social Credit, Universal Basic Income or ‘the dole’; it is that or extinction.
Me: Yes, it’s monetary Grace integrated with whatever diminishing employment remains (including diminishing armed services employment as well in a nation that is conscious and ethical) …..or a high likelihood of mass death and environmental poisoning. All one has to do is realize how many positive, constructive and personally rewarding purposes there are….besides and including work for pay.
Why is it that we don’t understand this? It’s mostly because we are so mentally dulled by orthodoxy, habit and distraction that our consciousness is debauched. If we came into present time fully and experienced the intensely focused psychological state known as Grace we’d recognize the wonderful gift life/consciousness actually is….and how that experience so completely is paralleled by the combined policies of Social Credit/Wisdomics/Gracenomics. The naturalness, reflectivities and logicality of it exist and are replete.
JD: Another reason the Swiss rejected it is it’s the first time through. Also the following reason:
From http://commondreams.org/views/2016/06/06/universal-basic-income-why-it-not-crazy-and-not-going-away
About half the remaining traditional full-time jobs in advanced economies will be eliminated by automation in the next 10-20 years, so this is an idea whose time has come. Then why did the Swiss reject it by a 4-to-1 majority? Mainly because their deal with the European Union means that they have relatively open borders.
Luzi Stamm, a member of parliament for the right-wing Swiss People’s Party, liked the idea in principal but opposed it in practice: “Theoretically, if Switzerland were an island, the answer is yes,” he told the BBC. “But with open borders, it’s a total impossibility…If you offered every individual [living here] a Swiss amount of money, you would have billions of people who would try to move into Switzerland.”
Me: JD,
Yes, and of course there is a particle of truth in the Trumpism or any other variety of right wing xenophobic “thinking”, that is, having reasonable control of national borders is simply a part of intelligent governance..sans the xenophobia. Again, the correct path is an ACTUAL integration of philosophy, policy and ethics as I have defined it here numerous times.
JD: The elite is disintegrating from within as they always do
thanks to their extensive corruption. Many times in
history the odds have been against us and we’ve
risen to the occasion. The effort to control the entire
world is not achievable, unless we submit. More
people see the reality as time goes on, there is science
that suggests if 10% of the population commit to a new
way of being, the impact will spread throughout society.
Go PB and UBI, and local resilience initiatives.
Me: I’ll second that JD. And don’t forget that the first rule of marketing is showing someone that they need a new idea/thing…and how it can positively benefit them. That is why I believe a thrust toward awakening the small to medium sized business and the general populace to their natural self interested alliance for Banking in the public interest and sovereignly controlled and the dual policies of Social Credit/Wisdomics/Gracenomics is the way forward for the political battle that must ultimately be fought.