G —-> AII + PPD = (HBEF)

Gifting (G) as in Abundant Individual Income (AII) plus Proactive Price Deflation (PPD) = a Higher Balance, Equilibrium and Flow (HBEF)

G —->  AII + PPD = (HBEF)

Posted To Ellen Brown’s Forum 01/03/2016

I’m extremely pleased that the idea of a universal income/dividend is entering mainstream thinking, but these proposals still have the stench of orthodoxy hanging around them. It is not with an obsession for theoretical purity that I say this, I’m happy to integrate many threads of reform, but rather with a meticulous analysis and insistence upon what an actual integration is, namely the combination of ONLY the truth(s), workabilities and applicabilities of various reforms…so that an ethical ascension and complete solution is accomplished. We’ve labored with palliatives and easily overturned and thwarted reforms for well over a century. Strike the monopolistic beast of Finance in the heart, end its rule and enable it and every other business model to be reborn in a wholistic economy. There is no compromising or equivocating with slavery.

Posted To Mish Shedlock’s Blog 01/03/2016

It’s all  “blue smoke and mirrors”  so that Finance can live….and dominate another day. That is the complete look at it all.

***********************************

Old Wood:  If all currencies in the world are devaluing relative to the dollar, why are we not seeing corresponding reductions in prices of their imports.

Me:  Because the theory that the economy is in general equilibrium is false. It’s actually in a continual and radical state of cost inflation by cost accounting convention that all costs must go into price because as flows the system always creates more costs than it can possibly create in individual incomes. In a technologically advanced economy you have to create the conditions for the market to clear. Demon est Deus inversus.

General equilibrium theory is actually the self interested pawn of Finance and the tenaciously held delusive belief of libertarian and conservative economists and their pundits. Liberal economists of course don’t have any more of a clue about what the actual problem is either. Both sides of the aisle are unconsciously making either a war or a reactively vulgar socialism…inevitable.

Please try to look at the actual data in the cost accounting statistics of any and all enterprises and keep an open mind.

Old Wood:  But their whole excuse for devaluation is for price competitiveness, to stimulate their exports.

Me:  Exports are only one aspect of the overall system. If the entirety of the system from extraction of resources on through to retail sale is cost inflationary….cost inflation wins.

Crysangle:  What is actually happening though is that all the slack (deflationary , either due to productivity increases or market saturation) is being hijacked into government spending and financial resolution . They are simply taking the deflationary cut , and printing it in the name of 2% , and then spending it according to own agendas .

Me:  Government has its contribution to the problem. I’ve never denied that, but the deeper problem is the cost inflationary nature of the system itself. Government may add money, but the thing that is overlooked by most theorists is government injects money BACK INTO the system thus it does not and cannot remedy the problematic nature of the system ITSELF. The ONLY way the system can be balanced is for a supplemental income to go around/go directly to….the individual FIRST…and then into the system. Otherwise the cost inflationary nature of the system is re-initiated.  350 years ago when Say was around and technology was crude, mostly individual effort and not as expensive, the economy was fairly close to being in equilibrium. But that was 350 years ago for Chis sake! Theorists need to look at actualities unflinchingly and in an unbiased way.

Posted To Mish Shedlock’s Blog 1/01/2016

Donald Trump taps into the frustrations that everyone has over the lingering economic downturn. Liberals/Progressives had better realize this and offer a program that offers both a better philosophy and policies that will integrate Trump’s half truths and so be actual solutions …otherwise Trump may well become president. Nixon’s silent majority won him re-election by a land slide, and that right/fascist/populist mentality is alive and well in every generation. There is of course a left/socialist/populist constituency out there as well, and both varieties are potentially very dangerous. The only thing that will ever enable any worthwhile and lasting change is an actual integration of the truths, workabilities and applicabilities of these opposing political ideologies and economic theories. That requires an openness to wisdom which is the integrative process itself. The alternative is the seeming eternal contentiousness and lack of significant movement toward actual solutions that orthodoxies on both sides of the aisle have fallen into, and that have brought us to Trumpism and Bernie Sandersism.

Please consider it.

The Orthodoxy of Numerical Equilibrium

It does not matter nearly so much that there be a numerical economic and monetary equilibrium, but rather the economy and money system be free and free flowing. There are in fact multiple numerical equilibria possible of individual income and prices. Likewise the total amount of money circulating through the economy has little relevance except that it enable businesses to be profitable, the level of  consumption to production be reasonably close to its actual capabilities and the entirety of the populace be free from coercion by either governmental or commercial entities. The operative statistic is the amount of available individual income that will enable a satisfactory lifestyle universally. 

Numerical equillibrium has become a fetish.  The experience of being free from political and commercial  dominance within relative economic abundance…trumps it in every circumstance and at every moment.

What absolutely matters is whether the system itself, unfettered by political and/or commercial dominance, and in its normal operations, produces enough individual incomes for it to be free flowing…and distributes it (not re-distributes it from those who make much) so that the entire populace is free and content.

This means that if the system is not naturally free flowing and distributes inadequate amounts of individual income ….it is the duty of the monetary-financial, political and commercial leaders to craft policies that actually resolve the problem democratically/universally and at a level that accurately reflects the economy’s capabilities.

The Signs, Personal Reactions and Progression From Orthodoxy to New Truths

The signs and progressions of orthodoxy are immediate closed minded rejection, derision, irritation, more rejection along with refusal to look at data and theory presented which can go on literally forever, perhaps some looking but mostly non-comprehension, anxiety as recognition of truth knocks out a major stable datum and finally re-stabilization as the new truth becomes the new stable datum.

Quadrinity: The Ethic of Grace/Graciousness

The only thing higher and more important than attaining and maintaining of the personal experience of Grace is the personal and societal establishment of an ethic of Grace/Graciousness.  There are further integrations of the aspects of Grace above the basic experience that help fill out and maintain the experience, and of course the more the society can integrate the aspects of Grace into its various systems  the more thorough and complete would be the ethic/paradigm/zeitgeist of Grace would be. This is a Quadrinity which is characterized by continual re-starting the integrative process on any and all levels and in any and all ways.

The Upper and Lower Dialectic and the Cosmic Code

Lower: Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis

Higher: Includes the lower and also:

[ (Thesis,  Antithesis) Synthesis/Ascension of truth, workability, applicability and Ethical condition ]

Fits seamlessly within the Cosmic Code

[ (1 X 1′) X 1″ ]