In other words those costs must still be paid for by businesses….by continually including them in their prices….otherwise that business is headed for destroyed/obsolescent productive capability without the ability to replace them without incurring even more costs….and so most likely bankruptcy.

And of course the individual must pay for these additional costs as well…despite there currently being no systemically costless monetary way of increasing his income in order to be able to liquidate those costs/prices and thus enabling the system to approach an equilibrium….or a higher disequilibrium where total individual incomes would exceed costs/prices and thus the individual and the economy would tend toward increasing freedom/free flowingness.

The best economists now embrace complexity, or attempt to and fail to make sense out of it, rather than look at the empirical monetary data found in the three and four dimensional cost accounting statistics that every business compiles, recognizing the disequilibrated economic relationships and conditions there and crafting policies to correct it or even reverse its trends toward more freedom and free flowingness. Recently some economists have waded through the bulk of this complexity and come to the same conclusion as C. H. Douglas came to by empirical examination of the data, namely disequilibrium. As Grace is achievable by both the clarity of an intense and focused experience of conscious awareness of self in the midst of the constant flux of possible thoughts and experiences in the moment, and also the clarity achieved by observation, integration and cognition of truth, either of the subjective or objective routes to such clarity is possible. The one (subjective) is generally the much faster route to cognition as it is less ponderous and cautious but again, either way can be the route to the same insight.

However, the true test of economists and economic theories is the policy recommendations they make  as a result of their conclusions which generally monitors their view of themselves and others as well as their personal sense of ethics. And that is where an awareness of Grace as in graciousness becomes so very important.

[ ( Individual Monetary Entropy  X  Individual Monetary Non-entropy)  X  Higher Non-entropy of Increasing Grace/Freedom ]

[ (Debt  X  Monetary Gifting)  X  Grace as in reversal of descending entropic vector toward ethically ascendant greater individual economic freedom and systemic free flowingness ]

The Economy is inherently in a state of harmful, enslaving monetary disequilibrium. Its vector must be reversed toward a higher disequilibrium ratio characterized by total individual incomes exceeding total costs/prices and hence toward a more freeing and ethical system.

Freedom is a continuous state of both personal and/or systemic free flowingness and thus is a verb, a process above and ascending from the mere duality of  freedom versus entrapment. So should its personal philosophy and systemic policies be ascendant.

Mankind loves rules and being right and correct, and this is all well and good….so long as it doesn’t harden into smallish, austere and obsessively judgmental  concern to be right in one’s own mind. This applies as much to scientific orthodoxies as it does religious ones. Grace is flowing. It is not being “hung up” on rules, but neither is it some blithe, shallow and facile attitude toward  morals and ethics. Thus it is simultaneously depth of thinking and the ability to resist the vice of obsessive seriousness. It is this “dualistic yet integrated bothness” aspect of Wisdom that enables the thirdness-oneness aspect of Grace to become reality.

The most prevalent category of humor is known as “the reversal” that is a release of laughter as a result of the comparison of the obvious and the absurd or the true and the untrue as in satire. These are the dualistic yet momentarily integrated bothness aspect  of Wisdom, and are universally understood as a healthy experience and personal characteristic. Integrating Loving and laughing and knowing when to employ both or either is a human art, and being a flow, a process, leads to the pinnacle thirdness-oneness experience of Grace.

Please Ellen, you are free to use and speak about this plan, but if you would please cite me I would appreciate it.

My thinking is fully aligned with Social Credit philosophy and policy and I give C. H. Douglas his full due, its just that I show how the linguistic and psychological concept of Grace in all of its aspects is relevant to economic and monetary theory. I have also shown in my Wisdomics/Gracenomics posts and soon to be book that the concept of Grace is the not fully conscious thread that binds all of the leading theorists and reformers and their policies together. I think I deserve credit for that thinking, that cognition and the policies that would logically follow from it.

**********************************************************

Public Banking makes so much economic sense as in efficiency that, so long as private banking is still allowed, even if basically neutered as I see its only role, IMO opinion is guilty of either being bought or being woefully ignorant. David Graeber has enumerated how banking as a business model has been corrupt, destabilizing and domineering for the last 5000 years. Who in their right mind would suggest that we leave it in control of the money system and the economy??? Now Public Banking requires regulation as well, but with a sovereign entity having the final say about its creation and distribution, that has mandated policies that set the individual free, that create and are the definition of an economic equilibrium and that align with the concept of grace as in benevolent sovereignty….what’s to worry about except eternal vigilance which regardless is a part of an honest life anyway.