Kate Raworth is an intelligent and thoughtful economist like your former guests of Keen, Hudson and Mosler, and I agree with virtually all of their system’s analysis. The problem is none of the above begin at the actual starting point for deep and meaningful change and that is conceptual analysis that leads to the identification and application of what everyone says they want to see which is paradigm change. New paradigm concepts identify the core applicable aspect of the core problematic area of the pattern under analysis. New paradigms are, ironically, a single concept that strategically applied resolves the anomalies of the current paradigm and changes the complexities of the entire pattern. For instance, helio-centrism instead of geo-centrism or homesteading, urbanization and agriculture instead of nomadic hunting and gathering. Until you identify the new paradigm and its specific applications its cart before the horse and, albeit interesting, endless intellectual babble over dualities that do not resolve. However, paradigmatic analysis like wisdom insights are deep resolving simplicities that enlighten thirdness greater onenesses. Quiz: the beneficial aspects of every historical paradigm change have always been an aspect or aspects of the natural philosophical concept of grace. So what aspect of grace would apply as the new concept for the economy and the money system, and when and where might be the best point in the economy to implement/apply that concept?