Discussion is obviously a good thing, but is more productive AFTER one has recognized its relevant philosophical/psychological-experiential antecedent. Science is a trinity-fragmenting/fragmented-process of [ Hypothesis <–> (true?, false?) ] and so does not lead mentally in the necessary direction. Wisdom is a trinity-unity-oneness/wholeness-process…that also includes the scientific dualistic determination of truthfulness/falsity within it. This is why we need a Wisdomics instead of a mere economics. The more inclusive, more integrated the mindset the better. Consult the world’s major wisdom traditions for their mental/experiential/proverbial insights sans any of their surface dogmas and determine their pinnacle concepts/experiences….and then align and apply policy and regulation to the relevant situation or body of knowledge under discussion.