I understand this is anathema to the economist of scientific and mathematical mind, and even of the most iconoclastic reformer, but historically paradigm change has always been of such depth and breadth of transformational change that…that is exactly how such tinkering appears once one sees the paradigm change.

In no way is this any put down or discouragement of further scientific research or of science’s necessity, nor is it any advocacy of some sort of parochial or sectarian religious dogmatism. It is the advocacy of the integration of the scientific method and aspects of human wisdom-consciousness which has always been the signature of scientific breakthrough.