The problem is we have 1) financial monopoly, and the consequent economic instability, 2) a coalescence of monopolistic financial integration while the economic disintegration continues and 3) dueling rigid and arrogant orthodoxies regarding the resolution of the economic and financial monopoly.

Thus we have 1) present monopoly 2) trending monopoly and 3) dualistic refusal to even consider a third way that integrates the particle of truth in both sides and thus ends the financial monopoly. Thus we have stops on 3 above, that is Starting,  2 above, Changing and 1 above, Stopping/ending the key and basic economic problem, namely the financial monopoly.

Finally, we could have a continual process of Starting, Changing and Stopping while being “boiled in oil” via a slow deflationary trend of for decades that has many “hopeful”ups and hope destroying downs, the whole while remaining in the full stop monopolistic situation described above. This is what Finance probably hopes it can pull off, themselves making money all along exploiting every dip and tick.

Or we could enable markets to act as equilibrium theorists BELIEVE they do and thus have both wonderful prosperity for everyone and a general tendency toward equilibrium…..if we’d only 1) Start by dropping our BELIEF in general equilibrium and 2) Change by implementing a universal dividend and a retail discount. That way we could 3) Stop having a scarcity of demand, Stop having a financial monopoly that prevents a direct gift of money to the individual that resolves the scarcity of demand and Stop the oppressive burden on businesses of having to get full costs plus a profit while there is a systemic scarcity of demand.

When you actually look at the policies themselves and their effects it’s really a simple 1, 2, 3 process that serves 1) the individual, 2) systemic freedom and 3) the break up of the present virtual monopoly on credit creation and the absolute restriction on the vehicle for the distribution of credit, i.e. loan only and for production only.