I’d just like to say the following regarding Greg’s opinion that what I have said is useless. To the primarily pragmatic ontology is meaningless. To the primarily ontological pragmatism often suffers. If you integrate the truths of both pragmatism and ontology you get Wisdom and if you keep on integrating every factor in any given situation, theory or system etc., that is applying actual Wisdom, you will eventually attain a state of unitary flow regarding it. With religions, all of which to varying degrees stress the importance of love you get the unitary flowing state of Grace/graciousness.
The point is to integrate and keep on integrating…especially love and action which is Grace. And if you won’t “drag” Grace or even philosophical grace into the discussion, that is actually look at such, then how are you going to understand Social Credit which is based on one or both? This was my point with Greg.
At any rate I’m tired of all that, and except that it tended to clarify my thinking regarding it somewhat I’d much rather simply contemplate Wisdom, love and Grace/grace.
Social Credit/Wisdomics/Gracenomics/ Gracientialism 